Teams

Woodside - Chafin

2026 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '26 · Men 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-06vs RVW - MoralesWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteve Watson / David Hughes vs Jim Wheeler / Ken Wheeler6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatrick Daly / Forrest Anderson vs Henry Moon / Brandon Brewer6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Homan / Allan Hickman vs Iran Morales / Max Kennedy6-3, 6-3
2026-02-19vs CSRATA/Gregory MahoneyLost 13
L#1 DoublesBanks Mumford / David Hughes vs Ross Lyons / Alex Ferrand6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesWill Chafin vs Nathan Morgan0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Homan / Jeffrey Crenshaw vs William Liebel / Ivan Florentino6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSteve Watson / Patrick Daly vs Brian Mirshak / Julian Harrison6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-12vs Fleming - DouseWon 31
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Proctor / Jeffrey Crenshaw vs Damon Wright / Dave Besel6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAllan Hickman vs James Xiao4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBanks Mumford / David Hughes vs Eraaj Patel / Thomas Ruffin6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Homan / Will Chafin vs Ashish Gohel / Jagdish Chawla6-1, 6-3
2026-02-05vs RVW - MoralesWon 32
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Homan / Jeffrey Crenshaw vs Max Kennedy / Henry Moon6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Proctor vs Iran Morales4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDonn Kump / Will Chafin vs Jim Wheeler / Ken Wheeler6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesForrest Anderson vs Jeffrey Wood4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBanks Mumford / Joshua Beler vs Brandon Brewer / Ethan Rodrigues6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-01-29vs CSRATA/Gregory MahoneyLost 23
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Homan / Benjamin Proctor vs Ross Lyons / Austin Rich3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWill Chafin vs Nathan Morgan0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Hughes / Banks Mumford vs Jacob Kranenberg / Julian Harrison6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Crenshaw vs Benjamin Prijatel4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDonn Kump / Forrest Anderson vs William Je / Gregory Mahoney3-6, 0-6
2026-01-22vs Fleming - DouseLost 14
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Homan / Patrick Daly vs Jonathan Baker / Robert Manz7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Proctor vs Dave Besel7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBanks Mumford / Joshua Beler vs Damon Wright / Joel Scraper4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Crenshaw vs James Xiao4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Watson / George Larsen vs Ashish Gohel / Eraaj Patel1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Marcelo Carvajal
published
3.06
Jeffrey Crenshaw
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.04
Jeffrey Homan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Benjamin Proctor
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
David Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Allan Hickman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.86
Patrick Daly
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Banks Mumford
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Donn Kump
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Forrest Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Steve Watson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Will Chafin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.43
George Larsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joshua Beler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Banks Mumford + Benjamin Proctor6062% games+9.3% vs expected
Joshua Beler + Banks Mumford314 matchesnot enough data
Allan Hickman + Jeffrey Homan404 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Proctor + Jeffrey Homan404 matchesnot enough data
Banks Mumford + David Hughes213 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Crenshaw + Jeffrey Homan303 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Homan + Donn Kump213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcelo Carvajal
11W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
Jeffrey Crenshaw
11W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Jeffrey Homan
18W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Benjamin Proctor
17W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
David Hughes
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Allan Hickman
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Patrick Daly
17W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Banks Mumford
15W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Donn Kump
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Forrest Anderson
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Steve Watson
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Will Chafin
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
George Larsen
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.43
Joshua Beler
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.