Teams

New Rochelle Racquet - NRRC 955

2023 55&Over Men · 9.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-22vs Eastern/Kissner/55&Over9.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesLawrence Green / Dan Forrester vs Tom Givone / David Ulrich0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChris Stokes / David Wenstrup vs Steven Sokol / David Ober3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-17vs Eastern/Kissner/55&Over9.0MSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChris Stokes / Dan Forrester vs Marc Lowitz / Andrew Canning6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLawrence Green / Lawrence Hirsch vs Steven Sokol / Keith Seidman6-1, 6-3
2023-08-03vs Eastern/Kissner/55&Over9.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesRusty Wright / David Wenstrup vs David Ulrich / Andrew Canning6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Dalton / Jeffrey Tamis vs David Lerner / Paul Kissner1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAndy Blotner / Daniel Harelick vs Junji Miyake / MICHAEL PEDZIWIATR7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-27vs SPORTIME WestchesterLost 12
W#1 DoublesPeter Olbrys / Rusty Wright vs Adam Friedman / Jorge Wilmer6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLawrence Hirsch / Lawrence Green vs Daniel Wice / Gregory Proudian3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesWilliam Finck / David Wenstrup vs Jeffrey Carpenter / Dan Fried3-6, 2-6
2023-07-20vs LI: Carefree, Kolenberg/PerriLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Sirovich / Fred Ross vs Adam Kolenberg / Donald Wall2-6, 2-6
2023-07-11vs SPORTIME WestchesterLost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Stokes / Dan Forrester vs David Goode / Scott Kalb1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Dalton / Jeffrey Tamis vs David Salzman / Kenneth Nova3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-29vs Eastern/Kissner/55&Over9.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesLawrence Green / Chris Stokes vs Marc Lowitz / David Lerner3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Michinko / Jeffrey Tamis vs David Ulrich / Andrew Canning3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Wenstrup / William Finck vs David Ober / MICHAEL PEDZIWIATR7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-22vs SPORTIME WestchesterLost 12
W#1 DoublesLawrence Green / Rusty Wright vs David Goode / David Salzman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Olbrys / David Wenstrup vs Daniel Wice / Gregory Proudian6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Dalton / Jeffrey Tamis vs Jaime Juan / Jeffrey Carpenter6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Lawrence Hirsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Andrew Frank
published 4.5
Chris Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Dan Forrester
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Lawrence Green
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.85
Daniel Harelick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Andy Blotner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.72
David Wenstrup
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.64
Jeffrey Tamis
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.62
Michael Dalton
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
John Michinko
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Matthew Sirovich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Olbrys
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Pradeep Crasto
published
Rusty Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
William Finck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Tamis + David Wenstrup9165% games+7.2% vs expected
Lawrence Hirsch + Lawrence Green16853% games+3.5% vs expected
Chris Stokes + Andy Blotner10656% games+2.9% vs expected
Jeffrey Tamis + Michael Dalton12854% games+2.5% vs expected
Chris Stokes + Dan Forrester6353% games+0.9% vs expected
Chris Stokes + Lawrence Green1537% games−3.3% vs expected
Lawrence Green + Dan Forrester4446% games−4.2% vs expected
Andy Blotner + Dan Forrester134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lawrence Hirsch
70W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Andrew Frank
26W–60L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Chris Stokes
43W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Dan Forrester
24W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lawrence Green
52W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Daniel Harelick
55W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4.5
Andy Blotner
29W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.82
4
David Wenstrup
66W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Jeffrey Tamis
69W–61L career · 7 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.64
Michael Dalton
86W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.62
John Michinko
34W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Sirovich
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Peter Olbrys
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pradeep Crasto
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rusty Wright
29W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
William Finck
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.