Teams

SPORTIME Westchester

2023 55&Over Men · 9.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-10vs Eastern/Kissner/55&Over9.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Carpenter / Gregory Proudian vs Junji Miyake / MICHAEL PEDZIWIATR5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJorge Wilmer / Scott Kalb vs Tom Givone / David Factor5-7, 6-7
2023-07-27vs New Rochelle Racquet - NRRC 955Won 21
L#1 DoublesAdam Friedman / Jorge Wilmer vs Peter Olbrys / Rusty Wright3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Wice / Gregory Proudian vs Lawrence Hirsch / Lawrence Green6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Carpenter / Dan Fried vs William Finck / David Wenstrup6-3, 6-2
2023-07-13vs Eastern/Kissner/55&Over9.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Goode / Scott Kalb vs David Ulrich / Paul Kissner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteven Raab / David Salzman vs Marc Lowitz / Robert Reby2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Carpenter / Dan Fried vs Larry Teitelbaum / David Factor2-6, 3-6
2023-07-11vs New Rochelle Racquet - NRRC 955Won 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Goode / Scott Kalb vs Chris Stokes / Dan Forrester6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Salzman / Kenneth Nova vs Michael Dalton / Jeffrey Tamis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdam Friedman / Steven Raab vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-06vs Eastern/Kissner/55&Over9.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Goode / Jeffrey Carpenter vs Marc Lowitz / Robert Reby6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Wice / Gregory Proudian vs Larry Teitelbaum / David Lerner1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSteven Raab / Richard Liebman vs Paul Kissner / David Ulrich1-6, 0-6
2023-06-22vs New Rochelle Racquet - NRRC 955Won 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Goode / David Salzman vs Lawrence Green / Rusty Wright3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Wice / Gregory Proudian vs Peter Olbrys / David Wenstrup3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJaime Juan / Jeffrey Carpenter vs Michael Dalton / Jeffrey Tamis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-01vs Eastern/Kissner/55&Over9.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Goode / Scott Kalb vs Marc Lowitz / David Ober6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Carpenter / Daniel Wice vs Paul Kissner / David Ulrich3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDan Fried / Richard Liebman vs David Lerner / Larry Teitelbaum2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Jorge Wilmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Dan Fried
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
David Goode
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
David Salzman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Jaime Juan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Gregory Proudian
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.00
Daniel Wice
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Adam Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.93
Jeffrey Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kenneth Nova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Liebman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Kalb
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Steven Raab
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Vaughan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Proudian + Daniel Wice101447% games−5.7% vs expected
Gregory Proudian + Jeffrey Carpenter044 matchesnot enough data
Dan Fried + Jeffrey Carpenter134 matchesnot enough data
Jorge Wilmer + Dan Fried033 matchesnot enough data
Steven Raab + Daniel Wice123 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Wice + Adam Friedman123 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Wice + Jeffrey Carpenter123 matchesnot enough data
David Goode + Scott Kalb303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jorge Wilmer
38W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Dan Fried
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
David Goode
39W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
David Salzman
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Jaime Juan
1W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Gregory Proudian
24W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Daniel Wice
27W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
4.5
Adam Friedman
10W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.96
Jeffrey Carpenter
21W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.93
Kenneth Nova
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Richard Liebman
31W–37L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Kalb
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Raab
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Vaughan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.