Teams

Indy A18 3.0M JCC Somers

Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CITA Indy 18 & Over 3.0 Men, W

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-03vs Indy A18 3.0M IND PetryLost 02
L#1 DoublesWill Fay / Aiyasami Salem vs Drew Darby / Armando Rodriguez0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Belschner vs Evan Behmlander1-6, 2-6
2026-02-24vs Indy A18 3.0M IRCD AungWon 21
W#1 DoublesJw Lail / David Katz vs Thomas Jean / Travis Kepner6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Belschner vs Todd Lothery6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Somers / Richard Ellis vs Felix Medina / James Casselman6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Ellis / Scott Zoll vs Matthew Rogers / Flavio Baldoni3-6, 2-6
2026-02-14vs Indy A18 3.0M IND PetrySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAiyasami Salem / Daniel Somers vs Carl VanWinkle / Armando Rodriguez6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMichael Belschner / Richard Ellis vs Theodore Thompson / Jeffrey Campbell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-27vs Indy A18 3.0M IRCD PuckettLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Katz / Jw Lail vs Jon Fisher / Zeke Skulski7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-24vs Indy A18 3.0M IND PetrySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAiyasami Salem / Daniel Somers vs Carl VanWinkle / Bob Slowikowski2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Ellis / Jonathan Wade vs Drew Darby / Jeffrey Campbell4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-01-06vs Indy A18 3.0M IRCD PuckettLost 12
L#1 DoublesAiyasami Salem / Jonathan Wade vs Jared Houser / Sean Sullivan1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Katz vs Aaron Kremer6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRichard Ellis / Richard Marshall vs Edward Escasa / Mitch Hanberg0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CITA Indy 18 & Over 3.0 Men, W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
David Katz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.81
Daniel Somers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Michael Belschner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Richard Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Aiyasami Salem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jonathan Wade
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Katz
20W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Daniel Somers
26W–85L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Michael Belschner
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Richard Ellis
7W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Aiyasami Salem
2W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.31
Jonathan Wade
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.