Teams

Indy A18 3.0M IRCD Puckett

Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CITA Indy 18 & Over 3.0 Men, W

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-02-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesLuis Hevia vs Patrick McGill6-3, 6-2
2026-02-03vs Indy A18 3.0M IND PetryWon 30
W#1 DoublesMitch Hanberg / Edward Escasa vs Theodore Thompson / William Hazelwood6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLuis Hevia vs Mike Petry6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Delp / Matthew Rogers vs Jeffrey Campbell / Armando Rodriguez6-3, 6-2
2026-01-27vs Indy A18 3.0M JCC SomersWon 30
W#1 DoublesJon Fisher / Zeke Skulski vs David Katz / Jw Lail5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLuis Hevia vs Patrick McGill6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAaron Kremer / Chris Delp vs Will Fay / James Schwarz6-0, 6-1
2026-01-13vs Indy A18 3.0M IND PetryWon 30
W#1 DoublesRonald Todd / Mitch Hanberg vs Theodore Thompson / William Hazelwood6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLuis Hevia vs Mike Petry6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJared Houser / Jon Fisher vs Peter Blanchard / Terrence Kirby6-3, 6-1
2026-01-06vs Indy A18 3.0M JCC SomersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAaron Kremer vs David Katz2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEdward Escasa / Mitch Hanberg vs Richard Ellis / Richard Marshall6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CITA Indy 18 & Over 3.0 Men, W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Edward Escasa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Luis Hevia
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.97
Chris Delp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Troy Puckett
published
2.73
Aaron Kremer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Jon Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Ronald Todd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Fisher + Ronald Todd2343% gamesnot enough data
Troy Puckett + Chris Delp314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edward Escasa
113W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Luis Hevia
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Chris Delp
54W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Troy Puckett
174W–90L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Aaron Kremer
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
Jon Fisher
39W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Ronald Todd
19W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.