Teams

Liberty Park-Warren

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W PM

17 players · average NTRP 3.88 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesDebi Johnson / Sarah Love vs Michele Halls / Kristel Affleck6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesMindy Dunyon / Debi Johnson vs Emily King / Catherine Lever6-3, 6-1
2023-06-22vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberryLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebi Johnson / Berit Campion vs Shelli Johnston / Pam Ollivier3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Lombardi / Sabrena Suite-Mangum vs Karen Christensen / Andrea Smith7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Love / Sabrena Suite-Mangum vs Amy Earl / Alena Taylor6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0W PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cottonwood Club-Warren6225722235
2Liberty Park Tennis-Johnson/Kasteler53161634260
3Liberty Park-Warren26141840286
4Liberty Park Tennis-Houston26112146326
5Ivory Ridge-Smith2672552350

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Staci McCubbins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Kristi Warren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Melissa Despain
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.65
Mindy Dunyon
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Sarah Love
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.58
Debi Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Pamela Roberts
published
3.54
Sabrena Suite-Mangum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Berit Campion
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.26
Robin Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Maria Lombardi
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.07
Allison Leishman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Sandy Adamson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sara Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shauna Lake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Sundi Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Susanne Mcdonald
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Staci McCubbins + Melissa Despain8561% games+13.9% vs expected
Maria Lombardi + Robin Simmons4169% games+10.9% vs expected
Kristi Warren + Sara Johnson10270% games+6.7% vs expected
Staci McCubbins + Robin Simmons6248% games+6.4% vs expected
Mindy Dunyon + Staci McCubbins10353% games+4.5% vs expected
Sarah Love + Sabrena Suite-Mangum8356% games+3.3% vs expected
Shauna Lake + Allison Leishman0537% games+3.0% vs expected
Robin Simmons + Melissa Despain13954% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Staci McCubbins
68W–100L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
Kristi Warren
242W–134L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Melissa Despain
174W–109L career · 13 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Mindy Dunyon
121W–85L career · 7 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Sarah Love
197W–133L career · 11 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Debi Johnson
139W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.58
Pamela Roberts
99W–46L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Sabrena Suite-Mangum
82W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Berit Campion
104W–139L career · 8 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Robin Simmons
185W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Maria Lombardi
228W–163L career · 8 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Allison Leishman
132W–209L career · 10 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Sandy Adamson
34W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Johnson
59W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Shauna Lake
134W–131L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sundi Brown
36W–23L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susanne Mcdonald
31W–28L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.