GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Dominguez/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.35 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings8 teams · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/Hoy/18&over/3.5W	10	1	40	15	38	394
2GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Castillo/FB	9	2	37	18	40	395
3GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Aldrete/TW#2	9	2	36	19	46	443
4GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Dominguez/EPTC#1	8	3	36	19	53	460
5GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC#1	7	4	29	26	60	496
6GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Fernandez/EPTC#2	5	6	29	26	60	466
7GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Gutierrez/EPTC#4	5	6	26	29	62	495
8GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Frank/EPCC#2	3	8	26	29	62	484

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37

Dinorah Martel

usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published 3.5

3.28

Blanca Olmos

usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published 3.5

3.25

Estela Abelleira

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5

3.19

Ana Dominguez

usually #3 Doubles 34%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5

3.16

Guadalupe Saenz

usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.16

Cecilia Trejo

usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5

3.07

Dolly Ricks

usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5

2.99

Gloria King

usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3

2.90

Concepcion Bueno

usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 3

2.83

Ada Castro

usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3

—

Jessica Fierro

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Maria Vazquez de Medina

usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published —

—

Mariel Berdeja

usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 28% · published —

—

Mayela Baca

usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 23% · published —

—

Natalia Castaneda

usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Paulina Sandoval

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published —

—

Renee Aguilar

usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Rossana Roacho

usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dolly Ricks + Rossana Roacho	8–2	61% games	+4.0% vs expected
Guadalupe Saenz + Dolly Ricks	5–4	51% games	+2.6% vs expected
Concepcion Bueno + Blanca Olmos	11–2	64% games	+0.5% vs expected
Ana Dominguez + Estela Abelleira	12–6	58% games	not enough data
Estela Abelleira + Blanca Olmos	9–8	58% games	not enough data
Ana Dominguez + Blanca Olmos	8–7	57% games	not enough data
Dinorah Martel + Blanca Olmos	4–7	44% games	not enough data
Guadalupe Saenz + Blanca Olmos	6–4	52% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

Dinorah Martel

19W–30L career · 17 lines in 2026

<1%83%16%

3.37

3.5

Blanca Olmos

95W–73L career · 44 lines in 2026

1%94%5%

3.28

3.5

Estela Abelleira

39W–43L career · 26 lines in 2026

2%95%3%

3.25

3.5

Ana Dominguez

48W–51L career · 33 lines in 2026

7%92%1%

3.19

3.5

Guadalupe Saenz

72W–59L career · 21 lines in 2026

10%89%<1%

3.16

3.5

Cecilia Trejo

34W–28L career · 23 lines in 2026

11%88%<1%

3.16

3.5

Dolly Ricks

58W–73L career · 22 lines in 2026

30%70%<1%

3.07

Gloria King

100W–61L career · 61 lines in 2026

<1%54%46%

2.99

Concepcion Bueno

64W–27L career · 29 lines in 2026

<1%77%23%

2.90

Ada Castro

33W–36L career · 24 lines in 2026

1%90%9%

2.83

—

Jessica Fierro

12W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Maria Vazquez de Medina

24W–44L career · 28 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mariel Berdeja

19W–19L career · 18 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mayela Baca

19W–9L career · 20 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Natalia Castaneda

39W–28L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Paulina Sandoval

10W–2L career · 12 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Renee Aguilar

36W–19L career · 17 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Rossana Roacho

118W–114L career · 36 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.