GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Aldrete/TW#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

19 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings8 teams · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/Hoy/18&over/3.5W	10	1	40	15	38	394
2GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Castillo/FB	9	2	37	18	40	395
3GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Aldrete/TW#2	9	2	36	19	46	443
4GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Dominguez/EPTC#1	8	3	36	19	53	460
5GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC#1	7	4	29	26	60	496
6GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Fernandez/EPTC#2	5	6	29	26	60	466
7GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Gutierrez/EPTC#4	5	6	26	29	62	495
8GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Frank/EPCC#2	3	8	26	29	62	484

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50

Adriana Aldrete

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.41

Ani Ramos

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.26

Annette Segesman

usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5

3.25

Carla Yepo

usually #1 Doubles 26%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5

3.10

Chrystel Perreault

usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3.5

2.90

Alida Villarreal

usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3

2.85

Ariana Guerrero

usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.77

Brettney Dee Wilcox

usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 3

—

Erica McFarland

usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Hilda Finn

usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published —

—

Juana Lopez

usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Laura Orozco

usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Lorena Reynolds

usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published —

—

Martha Cunningham

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published —

—

Marykathleen Towle

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published —

—

Priscilla Gaona

usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 28% · published —

—

Regina Sol

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Savannah Zamora

usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published —

—

Thelma Campos

usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 47% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thelma Campos + Annette Segesman	8–12	49% games	+5.5% vs expected
Marykathleen Towle + Carla Yepo	6–10	47% games	+4.5% vs expected
Ani Ramos + Adriana Aldrete	13–12	52% games	not enough data
Marykathleen Towle + Chrystel Perreault	4–7	45% games	not enough data
Laura Orozco + Chrystel Perreault	3–6	36% games	not enough data
Thelma Campos + Hilda Finn	7–1	61% games	not enough data
Laura Orozco + Marykathleen Towle	3–5	41% games	not enough data
Lorena Reynolds + Martha Cunningham	4–3	44% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Adriana Aldrete

32W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026

51%49%<1%

3.50

3.5

Ani Ramos

29W–28L career · 7 lines in 2026

<1%73%27%

3.41

3.5

Annette Segesman

50W–49L career · 22 lines in 2026

3%93%4%

3.26

3.5

Carla Yepo

50W–56L career · 20 lines in 2026

4%93%4%

3.25

3.5

Chrystel Perreault

91W–93L career · 26 lines in 2026

23%77%<1%

3.10

Alida Villarreal

40W–28L career · 27 lines in 2026

<1%76%24%

2.90

Ariana Guerrero

30W–19L career · 18 lines in 2026

1%85%14%

2.85

Brettney Dee Wilcox

48W–46L career · 29 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

2.77

—

Erica McFarland

28W–16L career · 33 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Hilda Finn

81W–96L career · 32 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Juana Lopez

64W–23L career · 32 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Laura Orozco

51W–109L career · 17 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Lorena Reynolds

78W–105L career · 22 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Martha Cunningham

45W–31L career · 18 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Marykathleen Towle

41W–84L career · 26 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Priscilla Gaona

20W–31L career · 32 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Regina Sol

24W–14L career · 27 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Savannah Zamora

22W–25L career · 29 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Thelma Campos

50W–51L career · 17 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.