Teams

RHCC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-17vs HIW BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKari Eckert / Briana Jackson vs Lindsey Strickler / Amy Long6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Beth Trammell vs Mikell Howington / Mary Tribby6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLindsey Fleener / Shannon Byerly vs Deirdre Brigham / Angela Appleby1-6, 1-6
2023-07-03vs HIW GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesKari Eckert / Briana Jackson vs Jessie Pellant / Kimberly Easton6-1, 7-5
2023-06-26vs MVCC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesKari Eckert / Briana Jackson vs Kate Colon / Kristin Mazzarese6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Jill Haug vs Angela Mays / Kim Hassinger7-5, 6-3
2023-06-19vs BP GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Kari Eckert vs Melanie Escobar / JJ Wagner2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesShannon Byerly / Lindsey Fleener vs Mandy Staehler / Gina Cozza3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-12vs MC NAVYSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Briana Jackson vs Kristen Philbrook / Elsa Zimmerer6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesShannon Byerly / Lindsey Fleener vs Jackie Greiner / Laureen Weber4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-05vs NJ TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesKari Eckert / Briana Jackson vs Holly McClure / Mary Alberts6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Abbey Wood vs Brigid McClaire / Diane Hedberg6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeth Trammell / Shannon Byerly vs Tamara Cook / Mette Boes6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Briana Jackson
published 4
2.91
Terri Whitehair
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Abbey Wood
published 3
2.74
Beth Trammell
published 3
2.57
Kari Eckert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Shannon Byerly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jill Haug
published
Lindsey Fleener
published
Nicolle McKinney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Eckert + Shannon Byerly4251% gamesnot enough data
Kari Eckert + Terri Whitehair123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Briana Jackson
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
3
Terri Whitehair
58W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Abbey Wood
20W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Beth Trammell
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Kari Eckert
64W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Shannon Byerly
35W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.46
Jill Haug
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Fleener
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicolle McKinney
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.