Teams

HIW GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-17vs BP GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Vance / Linda Nielander vs JJ Wagner / Erin Heltshe1-6, 3-6
2023-07-10vs MVCC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Nielander / Kimberly Easton vs Kristin Mazzarese / Marci Grant1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSonya Sava vs Margaret Lea6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-03vs RHCC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesWendy Vance / Linda Nielander vs Nicolle McKinney / Abbey Wood7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-02vs HIW BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesWendy Vance / Kimberly Easton vs Angela Appleby / CAROLINE MCQUEEN7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMadeline Schymanski / Linda Nielander vs Mary Tribby / Amy Long5-7, 2-6
2023-06-26vs MC NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Nielander / Madeline Schymanski vs Becky Lowery / Judith McKinney2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSonya Sava / Kimberly Easton vs Annmarie Oien / Jennifer Arnold7-6, 7-5
2023-06-19vs NJ TEALSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWendy Vance / Kimberly Easton vs Holly McClure / Mary Alberts6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMadeline Schymanski / Linda Nielander vs Kathleen Harvey / Brigid McClaire4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Wendy Vance
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Kimberly Easton
published
2.47
Sonya Sava
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.33
Linda Nielander
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.19
Megan Curtiss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Easton + Wendy Vance4258% games+2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Wendy Vance
28W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Kimberly Easton
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Sonya Sava
30W–31L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Linda Nielander
46W–98L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.33
Megan Curtiss
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.