Teams

RHCC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs MVCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMorgan Swank / Brandee Caswell vs Stephanie Buchanan / Tara McEnroe1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kos / Gretchen Moser vs Jessica Rowe / Margaret Parris6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-24vs NJ SILVERWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Smith / Morgan Swank vs Karen Kirby / Sara Quackenbush6-3, 7-6
2023-05-17vs HIW GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesGretchen Moser / Charlotte Smith vs Wendy Turman / Jayne McGarry6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kos / Morgan Swank vs Amanda Walker / Kristine Stump6-4, 7-5
2023-05-10vs RHCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Kos / Gretchen Moser vs Tiffany Skiles / Jo DeLisa2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMorgan Swank / Polly Traylor vs Cheryl Crawford / Melissa Anderson1-6, 3-6
2023-05-03vs LPTC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesGretchen Moser / Morgan Swank vs Michelle Dolin / Laurie Lahnert2-6, 2-6
2023-04-26vs MC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesPolly Traylor / Brandee Caswell vs Samantha Spiwak / Tara Cronin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGretchen Moser / Charlotte Smith vs Jillian Clark / Amy Hank6-0, 6-1
2023-04-19vs BP REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrandee Caswell / Morgan Swank vs Nancy Thompson / Deb Hall7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Bryn Marsh
published 3.5
3.04
Morgan Swank
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.77
Charlotte Smith
published 3
Gretchen Moser
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.61
Jennifer Kos
published
2.57
Brandee Caswell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Kos + Brandee Caswell2439% games−7.9% vs expected
Brandee Caswell + Gretchen Moser5260% gamesnot enough data
Gretchen Moser + Morgan Swank224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Kos + Gretchen Moser123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryn Marsh
33W–12L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Morgan Swank
69W–15L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Charlotte Smith
4W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Gretchen Moser
40W–39L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Kos
21W–22L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
2.61
3
Brandee Caswell
47W–33L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.