Teams

RHCC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs MC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Farquhar / Tessa Vickers vs Tara Cronin / Kelly Sengenberger7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-24vs BP REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Farquhar / Melissa Argenti vs Erica Younkin / Tazia Strausser6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-17vs MVCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Anderson / Liz Mercado vs Tara McEnroe / Nancy Fairchild1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTessa Vickers / Melissa Argenti vs Margaret Parris / Jessica Rowe6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-10vs RHCC BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesLana Mendonca vs Charlotte Smith6-1, 6-1
2023-05-03vs HIW GREENSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLiz Mercado vs Wendy Turman2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Anderson / Melissa Argenti vs Elan Lantz / Lindsay Conroy6-1, 6-1
2023-04-27vs NJ SILVERLost 02
L#1 SinglesLana Mendonca vs Daryna Piria6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Farquhar / Tessa Vickers vs Jessica Peterson / Sara Quackenbush5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-19vs LPTC REDSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLana Mendonca vs Casey Tatum6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLiz Mercado / Tessa Vickers vs Tina Atchley / Rebecca BaanHofman0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Tessa Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Lana Mendonca
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.86
Melissa Argenti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Cheryl Crawford
published 3
2.60
Tiffany Skiles
published
2.42
Liz Mercado
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Julie Farquhar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Farquhar + Melissa Argenti4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tessa Vickers
71W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Lana Mendonca
42W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Melissa Argenti
27W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Cheryl Crawford
10W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
Tiffany Skiles
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Liz Mercado
46W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%73%27%
2.42
2.5
Julie Farquhar
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.