Teams

Kiser

2022 Foothills Fall Slam Doubles · Womens 3.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-27vs Deuce BabyLost 01
L#1 DoublesElena Willging / Rhonda Kiser vs Staci Shafer / Zenaida Camacho6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-24vs Livert/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Rhonda Kiser vs Oksana Lackey / Adia Livert3-6, 1-6
2022-10-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Rhonda Kiser vs Kathy Collins / Lisa Moore1-6, 2-6
2022-10-14vs Livert/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Rhonda Kiser vs Oksana Lackey / Adia Livert2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-10-13vs Deuce BabyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Elena Willging vs Staci Shafer / Zenaida Camacho6-3, 7-6
2022-10-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesRhonda Kiser / Elena Willging vs Kathy Collins / Susan Robertson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-26vs Deuce BabyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Rhonda Kiser vs Staci Shafer / Zenaida Camacho6-4, 6-1
2022-09-13vs Livert/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Elena Willging vs Adia Livert / Mindy Murray0-6, 6-7
2022-09-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesElena Willging / Rhonda Kiser vs Kathy Collins / Lisa Moore6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Elena Willging
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Aleshia Abernathy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Rhonda Kiser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Julie Rodeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aleshia Abernathy + Rhonda Kiser342853% games−0.1% vs expected
Elena Willging + Rhonda Kiser10752% games−9.4% vs expected
Elena Willging + Aleshia Abernathy3261% gamesnot enough data
Julie Rodeck + Rhonda Kiser123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elena Willging
147W–87L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.04
3.5
Aleshia Abernathy
166W–132L career · 3 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Rhonda Kiser
170W–115L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Julie Rodeck
84W–110L career · 3 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.