Teams

TOHS.Krasner

2023 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-14vs LOCH.PeltLost 01
L#3 DoublesTina Krasner / Keely Williams vs DeLana Anderson / Christine Dukiet2-6, 5-7
2023-05-09vs TOC.JabuschLost 01
L#1 DoublesKara Horton / Keely Williams vs Kelly Crawford / Tracy Morris4-6, 5-7
2023-05-07vs TOHS.StarrittWon 10
W#3 DoublesKara Horton / Leigh Barter vs Anne Hungate / Angela Ray6-2, 6-4
2023-04-16vs TOC.TriebertLost 02
L#1 DoublesKeely Williams / Kara Horton vs Emily Childs / Angela Baxley2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Yvette LeGrande6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-04-12vs APEX.TandradinataWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeigh Barter / Skylar Poole vs MacKenzie Williams / Aulia Tandradinata6-1, 6-3
2023-03-26vs TOC.KempfWon 10
W#2 DoublesKeely Williams / Leigh Barter vs Lisa Kempf / Marina Barthalmus4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-05vs TOC.IrishWon 20
W#2 DoublesLeigh Barter / Skylar Poole vs Lusia Li / Helen Cooper6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShannon Littleton / Keely Williams vs Meghan O'Hara / Jennifer Magee6-4, 6-2
2023-02-26vs MD.WilliamsWon 10
W#2 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Brinette Myers6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Skylar Poole
published
3.86
Leigh Barter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.63
Julie Dougherty
published
3.55
Kara Horton
published
3.50
Shannon Littleton
published
3.18
Katie Masood
published
2.88
Keely Williams
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.88
Cindy Bunce
published 3
2.84
Tina Krasner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Littleton + Julie Dougherty11857% games+3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Skylar Poole
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Leigh Barter
186W–64L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.86
Julie Dougherty
46W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.63
Kara Horton
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Shannon Littleton
34W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Katie Masood
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18
3
Keely Williams
185W–157L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Cindy Bunce
10W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Tina Krasner
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.