Teams

CP RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-05Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMatthew Bruff vs Kody Cassidy2-6, 0-6
2023-08-29vs WP BLACKLost 02
L#1 SinglesJose Amador vs Grant Glenn4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSean Hudelson / Benjamin Walker vs Jace Monroe / Luke Paulo4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-08-22vs DTC GREENWon 20
W#1 SinglesMatthew Bruff vs Henry Schloss6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJose Amador / Rob Mullins vs Jonathan Musser / Patrick O'Neal6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-16vs GPTC REDSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJose Amador vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSean Hudelson / Rob Mullins vs William Wall / Oliver McKinstry2-6, 3-6
2023-08-15vs CP GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHector Trevino / Matthew Bruff vs Adam Abraham / Troy Wilson7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDavid Arons vs Blair Watkins2-6, 2-6
2023-08-08vs CM BLUELost 02
L#1 SinglesJose Amador vs Jackson Stuart7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Arons / Rob Mullins vs Douglas Sparks / Sumant Bhat6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-25vs CP SILVERWon 21
W#1 DoublesHector Trevino / Matthew Bruff vs Daniel Greer / Adam Knox7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJose Amador vs Wayne Mitchel6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Arons / Benjamin Walker vs Scott Zeller / Zachary Nassar3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Matthew Bruff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Benjamin Walker
published 4.5
4.25
Jose Amador
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.25
Andy Duncan
published 4.5
4.24
Hector Trevino
published
3.75
Sean Hudelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
David Arons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.55
Rob Mullins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Arons + Sean Hudelson61045% games+2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Matthew Bruff
92W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Benjamin Walker
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Jose Amador
315W–162L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Andy Duncan
26W–29L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
Hector Trevino
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.24
4
Sean Hudelson
53W–92L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
David Arons
38W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Rob Mullins
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.