Teams

TAG

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-01vs CSU GOLDLost 05
L#1 DoublesSteve Niccolai / Ben Struzenberg vs Kim Bender / Dan Bikos7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTroy Hebbeler vs Noah Sorensen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesArnie Mascarenas / Keith Montey vs Derrick van der Sluys / Brad Biggerstaff4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDon Walker vs Federico Pardina2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDan Erbacher / Joseph Erbacher vs Mark Sundstedt / Scott Bloom1-6, 0-6
2022-05-25vs LVTA BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesArnie Mascarenas / Troy Hebbeler vs Adam Less / Brennan Ulbert1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesRobert Herrera vs Kenneth Keller6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteve Niccolai / Don Walker vs Jared Petersen / Dennis Flanigan6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichael Crews vs Josh Achtemeier4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDan Erbacher / Joseph Erbacher vs Daniel Ault / Eric Sorensen4-6, 2-6
2022-05-18vs HMTC REDWon 32
L#1 DoublesDon Walker / Ben Struzenberg vs Kent Mueller / Steven Tucker2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRobert Herrera vs John Agin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeith Montey / Arnie Mascarenas vs David Fanning / Dennis Knopf2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Crews vs Kendal Sanders6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDan Erbacher / Joseph Erbacher vs Nicola Demacopoulos / Glenn Gibson4-6, 2-6
2022-05-11vs CSU GOLDLost 23
L#1 DoublesSteve Niccolai / Don Walker vs Dan Bikos / Kim Bender6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRobert Herrera vs Noah Sorensen1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesArnie Mascarenas / Keith Montey vs Scott Bloom / Jim Kelly6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichael Crews vs Michael Bird1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDan Erbacher / Troy Hebbeler vs David Baird / Mark Sundstedt6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-04vs LVTA BLUELost 14
L#1 DoublesSteve Niccolai / Ben Struzenberg vs Jared Petersen / Brian Smith6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRobert Herrera vs Daniel Ault6-6
L#2 DoublesArnie Mascarenas / Keith Montey vs Adam Less / Eric Sorensen5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesTroy Hebbeler vs Josh Achtemeier2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDan Erbacher / Joseph Erbacher vs Dennis Flanigan / Mark Flanigan3-6, 0-6
2022-04-27vs HMTC REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesSteve Niccolai / Ben Struzenberg vs David Fanning / Kendal Sanders6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRobert Herrera vs Eric Fanning6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesArnie Mascarenas / Keith Montey vs Steven Tucker / Kent Mueller6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTroy Hebbeler vs John Agin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDan Erbacher / Joseph Erbacher vs Dennis Knopf / Gary Westlind4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Robert Herrera
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.66
Arnie Mascarenas
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.61
Troy Hebbeler
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.38
Don Walker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Ben Struzenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dan Erbacher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Erbacher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Keith Montey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Crews
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Steve Niccolai
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Niccolai + Troy Hebbeler2648% games+3.5% vs expected
Keith Montey + Don Walker4346% games−0.1% vs expected
Arnie Mascarenas + Keith Montey3248% games−0.6% vs expected
Dan Erbacher + Joseph Erbacher0529% games−21.0% vs expected
Don Walker + Ben Struzenberg5258% gamesnot enough data
Steve Niccolai + Ben Struzenberg134 matchesnot enough data
Keith Montey + Troy Hebbeler033 matchesnot enough data
Don Walker + Steve Niccolai123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Herrera
49W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Arnie Mascarenas
4W–7L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Troy Hebbeler
12W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Don Walker
44W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.38
Ben Struzenberg
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Dan Erbacher
2W–8L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Erbacher
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Keith Montey
16W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Crews
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Niccolai
14W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.