Teams

LVTA BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-01vs HMTC REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesBrian Smith / Zachary Schaefer vs David Fanning / Kendal Sanders6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrennan Ulbert vs Eric Fanning6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMark Flanigan / Dennis Flanigan vs James Morrison / Glenn Gibson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKenneth Keller vs John Agin1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Luna / Eric Sorensen vs Kent Mueller / Gary Westlind6-7, 3-6
2022-05-25vs TAGWon 32
W#1 DoublesAdam Less / Brennan Ulbert vs Arnie Mascarenas / Troy Hebbeler6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKenneth Keller vs Robert Herrera1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJared Petersen / Dennis Flanigan vs Steve Niccolai / Don Walker7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJosh Achtemeier vs Michael Crews6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Ault / Eric Sorensen vs Dan Erbacher / Joseph Erbacher6-4, 6-2
2022-05-18vs CSU GOLDLost 23
L#1 DoublesZachary Schaefer / Daniel Ault vs Michael Bird / David van Thuyne1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJosh Achtemeier vs Noah Sorensen1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJared Petersen / Brennan Ulbert vs Derrick van der Sluys / Jim Kelly7-5, 7-5
L#2 SinglesKenneth Keller vs Federico Pardina6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Mark Flanigan vs Kim Bender / Dan Bikos6-2, 7-5
2022-05-11vs HMTC REDWon 50
W#1 DoublesJared Petersen / Brian Smith vs Steven Tucker / Kent Mueller6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKenneth Keller vs Eric Fanning6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAdam Less / Brennan Ulbert vs Dennis Knopf / David Fanning6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesPaul Luna vs John Agin6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Mark Flanigan vs Nicola Demacopoulos / James Morrison6-3, 6-1
2022-05-04vs TAGWon 41
W#1 DoublesJared Petersen / Brian Smith vs Steve Niccolai / Ben Struzenberg6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDaniel Ault vs Robert Herrera6-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Less / Eric Sorensen vs Arnie Mascarenas / Keith Montey7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJosh Achtemeier vs Troy Hebbeler6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Mark Flanigan vs Dan Erbacher / Joseph Erbacher6-3, 6-0
2022-04-27vs CSU GOLDLost 23
L#1 DoublesJared Petersen / Brian Smith vs David van Thuyne / Michael Bird1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKenneth Keller vs Noah Sorensen1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBrennan Ulbert / Adam Less vs Mark Sundstedt / Brad Biggerstaff6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJosh Achtemeier vs David Baird6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Luna / Eric Sorensen vs Derrick van der Sluys / Scott Bloom2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Josh Achtemeier
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.86
Jared Petersen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.82
Adam Less
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Brennan Ulbert
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
Mark Flanigan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.53
Dennis Flanigan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.53
Kenneth Keller
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.44
Eric Sorensen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Daniel Ault
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Paul Luna
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Zachary Schaefer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Flanigan + Dennis Flanigan15557% games+0.3% vs expected
Jared Petersen + Adam Less4254% games−0.4% vs expected
Dennis Flanigan + Kenneth Keller1446% games−4.3% vs expected
Jared Petersen + Dennis Flanigan2345% games−5.6% vs expected
Dennis Flanigan + Adam Less6257% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Flanigan + Daniel Ault134 matchesnot enough data
Eric Sorensen + Dennis Flanigan033 matchesnot enough data
Brennan Ulbert + Adam Less303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josh Achtemeier
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
Jared Petersen
68W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Adam Less
76W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Brennan Ulbert
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Mark Flanigan
70W–63L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%15%85%
3.64
4
Dennis Flanigan
52W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
Kenneth Keller
9W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Eric Sorensen
10W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Daniel Ault
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Luna
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Zachary Schaefer
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.