Teams

Cagen Garriga

2025 Singles League 18&over-NE · 3.0 Men Singles

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-09vs Josh RileyWon 30
W#1 SinglesLuke Pannell vs Jeremy Taylor2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJody Lindsey vs Josh Riley6-0, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKarthik Venkatesh Prasad vs Richard Davis6-0, 6-0
2025-11-25vs JABILLost 03
L#1 SinglesKarthik Venkatesh Prasad vs Kevin Neal4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJody Lindsey vs Andy Burleson1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesCurtis Monts vs Gary Russell0-6, 0-6
2025-11-18vs Josh RileyWon 21
L#1 SinglesForrest Crumby vs Jeremy Taylor5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLuke Pannell vs Hunter Coleman6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCagen Garriga vs Josh Riley6-2, 6-1
2025-11-04vs JABILLost 12
L#1 SinglesKarthik Venkatesh Prasad vs James Bracken2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesBrad Lackey vs Damon Ladner7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJody Lindsey vs Carey Guy3-6, 6-7
2025-10-28vs Josh RileyWon 30
W#1 SinglesCagen Garriga vs Hunter Coleman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCurtis Monts vs Jeremy Taylor6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBen Galjour vs Robert Stukenborg5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-14vs JABILLost 12
L#1 SinglesBrad Lackey vs Gary Russell0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesForrest Crumby vs Chris Jabil0-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKimmel Monts vs Kevin Neal6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Men Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1JABIL511448112
2Cagen Garriga3310820154
3Josh Riley1531530198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Karthik Venkatesh Prasad
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Curtis Monts
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.75
Luke Pannell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.70
Forrest Crumby
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.68
Jody Lindsey
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.62
Ben Galjour
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.58
Brad Lackey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.37
Cagen Garriga
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
Kimmel Monts
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karthik Venkatesh Prasad
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
3
Curtis Monts
5W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luke Pannell
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Forrest Crumby
13W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Jody Lindsey
32W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Ben Galjour
11W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Brad Lackey
21W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Cagen Garriga
19W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.37
Kimmel Monts
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.