Teams

JABIL

2025 Singles League 18&over-NE · 3.0 Men Singles

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-02vs Josh RileyLost 12
L#1 SinglesChris Jabil vs Wayne Wade2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAndy Burleson vs Josh Riley4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesGary Russell vs Hunter Coleman6-4, 6-4
2025-11-25vs Cagen GarrigaWon 30
W#1 SinglesKevin Neal vs Karthik Venkatesh Prasad6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAndy Burleson vs Jody Lindsey6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesGary Russell vs Curtis Monts6-0, 6-0
2025-11-13vs Josh RileyWon 20
W#1 SinglesChris Jabil vs Josh Riley6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCarey Guy vs Richard Davis6-2, 6-3
2025-11-04vs Cagen GarrigaWon 21
W#1 SinglesJames Bracken vs Karthik Venkatesh Prasad6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDamon Ladner vs Brad Lackey5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesCarey Guy vs Jody Lindsey6-3, 7-6
2025-10-23vs Josh RileyWon 20
W#1 SinglesJames Bracken vs Wayne Wade6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesChris Jabil vs Josh Sullivan6-2, 6-0
2025-10-14vs Cagen GarrigaWon 21
W#1 SinglesGary Russell vs Brad Lackey6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesChris Jabil vs Forrest Crumby6-0, 6-4
L#3 SinglesKevin Neal vs Kimmel Monts1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Men Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1JABIL511448112
2Cagen Garriga3310820154
3Josh Riley1531530198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Gary Russell
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.04
James Bracken
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Kevin Neal
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.87
Chris Jabil
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Andy Burleson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Damon Ladner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.67
Carey Guy
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gary Russell
37W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
James Bracken
11W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kevin Neal
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Chris Jabil
38W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Andy Burleson
23W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Damon Ladner
21W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Carey Guy
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.