Teams

UPTA55C/Joffe/Thornblade

2026 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 9 9:00 AM
Holly Tree Club
Sep 16 9:00 AM
Thornblade Club
Sep 23 9:00 AM
Angela JoffeAmy Cupples
2026-08-26vs UPTA55C/Fischer-Farr/PavilionLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Williams / Erin Byxbee vs Gayle Hannon / Sharon Payne6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Rogers / Sena Claxton vs Katie Saad / Susan Tankersley4-6, 2-4
L#3 DoublesAngela Joffe / Carrie Dickert vs Jennifer Smith / Judy Niver6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-19vs UPTA55C/Brooks/KeoweeKeyWon 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Ruby / Erin Byxbee vs Liz Turnure / Tish Fontana6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPamela Finigan / Sarah Faust vs Eileen Simollardes / Patricia Robertson5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Joffe / Jane Miller vs Cynthia Fisher / Laurie Sinkele6-2, 6-4
2026-08-05vs UPTA55C/Wilson/BrookstoneLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Byxbee / Amy Williams vs Linda Musgrave / Kelly Gaber6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Rogers / Angela Joffe vs Lee Ann Wilson / Annette Curin4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie Dickert / Cathy Spitzmiller vs Chimene Evans / Angie McDade6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 55+ Combo Women - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA55C/Cain/Spindletree30631082
2UPTA55C/Dresden/Kroc3193681
3UPTA55C/Joffe/Thornblade317514109
4UPTA55C/Fischer-Farr/Pavilion22751199
5UPTA55C/White/acac226615117
6UPTA55C/McCarthy/Reserve1133762
7UPTA55C/Brooks/KeoweeKey12361498
8UPTA55C/Lawson/HollyTree135716118
9UPTA55C/Tassin/Keowee Key134818127
10UPTA55C/Wilson/Brookstone134819125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Denise Ruby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Marie Crumpler
published
3.21
Sally Seaver
published
3.12
Lisa Seay
published
3.11
Angela Joffe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Nancy Rudman
published
3.09
Pamela Finigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Cathy Spitzmiller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Erin Byxbee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Carrie Dickert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Shelley Mckay
published
2.80
Sena Claxton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Jane Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Amy Cupples
published 3
Nancy Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Cupples + Cathy Spitzmiller4155% games+10.2% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Angela Joffe3643% games+8.9% vs expected
Sena Claxton + Angela Joffe3548% games+1.1% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Lisa Seay4249% games−1.0% vs expected
Angela Joffe + Marie Crumpler2356% games−4.8% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Cathy Spitzmiller3249% gamesnot enough data
Sally Seaver + Cathy Spitzmiller213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Cupples + Erin Byxbee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Ruby
12W–9L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Marie Crumpler
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Sally Seaver
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Lisa Seay
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Angela Joffe
28W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Nancy Rudman
6W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Pamela Finigan
18W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cathy Spitzmiller
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
Erin Byxbee
54W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.92
3
Carrie Dickert
9W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Shelley Mckay
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Sena Claxton
14W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Jane Miller
26W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
0%18%82%
2.63
3
Amy Cupples
16W–26L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
Nancy Robinson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.