Teams

UPTA55C/Tassin/Keowee Key

2026 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 6.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 16 9:00 AM
The Reserve at Lake Keowee
Sep 23 9:00 AM
Joyce BrooksTish Fontana
2026-09-09vs UPTA55C/Wilson/BrookstoneWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Morris / Jean Zavertnik vs Melissa Maude / Sharon Colker6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Cobos / Muriel Rankin vs Peg Loyd / Linda Musgrave7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Foster / Judy Griffiths vs Angie McDade / Lee Ann Wilson6-4, 6-2
2026-09-02vs UPTA55C/Fischer-Farr/PavilionWon 21
W#1 DoublesKirsten Zinkann / Sandra Franklin vs Katie Saad / Lonna Farr6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDonna Bayless / Alison Banik vs Tammy Rodgers / Bessie Gonzalez6-3, 3-5
L#3 DoublesSusan Dougherty / Brenda Redpath vs Susan McClure / Caroline Warthen1-6, 1-6
2026-08-26vs UPTA55C/White/acacWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Morris / Katrina Prala vs Tina Underwood / Donna Parrett3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Cobos / Annette Aldridge vs Maria Miller / Stefani Wallen-Smith1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Bayless / Lorra Tassin vs Mary Lee Cole / Jennifer Casto6-0, 6-0
2026-08-19vs UPTA55C/Dresden/KrocLost 03
L#1 DoublesStacey Belkin / Kirsten Zinkann vs Jane Trexler / Ty Warlick1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeggy Braswell / Jean Zavertnik vs Tracy Churdar / Martha Gower3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Dougherty / Donna Bayless vs Carole Dresden / Marci Howle3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 55+ Combo Women - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA55C/Cain/Spindletree30631082
2UPTA55C/Dresden/Kroc3193681
3UPTA55C/Joffe/Thornblade317514109
4UPTA55C/Fischer-Farr/Pavilion22751199
5UPTA55C/White/acac226615117
6UPTA55C/McCarthy/Reserve1133762
7UPTA55C/Brooks/KeoweeKey12361498
8UPTA55C/Lawson/HollyTree135716118
9UPTA55C/Tassin/Keowee Key134818127
10UPTA55C/Wilson/Brookstone134819125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Stacey Belkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Charlotte Cobos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brenda Redpath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Donna Bayless
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Jean Zavertnik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Peggy Braswell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Carolyn Foster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Judy Griffiths
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Kirsten Zinkann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Katrina Prala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Muriel Rankin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Marla Queen
published
2.76
Lorra Tassin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Annette Aldridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Alison Banik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Laurie Knapp
published
2.52
Susan Dougherty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Regina Porter
published
Sandra Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorra Tassin + Kirsten Zinkann3348% gamesnot enough data
Susan Dougherty + Kirsten Zinkann224 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Knapp + Muriel Rankin213 matchesnot enough data
Lorra Tassin + Muriel Rankin123 matchesnot enough data
Muriel Rankin + Katrina Prala123 matchesnot enough data
Katrina Prala + Annette Aldridge213 matchesnot enough data
Marla Queen + Annette Aldridge213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Belkin
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Charlotte Cobos
9W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Brenda Redpath
1W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Donna Bayless
5W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Jean Zavertnik
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
Peggy Braswell
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Carolyn Foster
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Judy Griffiths
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Kirsten Zinkann
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
Katrina Prala
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
Muriel Rankin
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Marla Queen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Lorra Tassin
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Annette Aldridge
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Alison Banik
4W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Laurie Knapp
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Susan Dougherty
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.52
Regina Porter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Franklin
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.