Teams

1 November

2022 NO LEAGUE REFUND HOLDING AREA · NO LEAGUE Refund Holding Area

22 players · average NTRP 3.95 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for NO LEAGUE Refund Holding Area have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Johan Holmberg
published 4.5
4.12
Pamela Dean
published
4.07
Angel Amponsah
published 4.5
4.02
Wendy Heger
published 4.5
3.94
Mekkla Thompson
published 4
3.81
Scott Aronson
published
3.76
Layna Kelly
published
3.76
Haider Abbud
published 4
3.64
Orlando Delgado
published 3.5
3.60
Struther van Horn
published
3.48
Surendra Babu
published
3.38
George Lamont
published 4
3.32
Diem Salmon
published 3.5
3.27
Andaiye Hamilton
published 3.5
3.25
James Appel
published 3.5
2.61
Laura Hieronymus
published
2.52
Mariechen Bresler
published
Jordan Zimmerman
published
Kominh Thongphok
published
Larry Johnson
published
Mary Roop
published
Shan Maitra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Layna Kelly + Angel Amponsah314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Johan Holmberg
128W–62L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
Pamela Dean
40W–40L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Angel Amponsah
27W–15L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Wendy Heger
142W–188L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Mekkla Thompson
161W–109L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.94
Scott Aronson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Layna Kelly
43W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Haider Abbud
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
3.5
Orlando Delgado
168W–64L career · no lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.64
Struther van Horn
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Surendra Babu
28W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
4
George Lamont
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Diem Salmon
63W–49L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Andaiye Hamilton
305W–151L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
James Appel
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Laura Hieronymus
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Mariechen Bresler
6W–22L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52
Jordan Zimmerman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kominh Thongphok
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Larry Johnson
24W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Roop
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shan Maitra
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.