GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Alarcon/TW#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings11 teams · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Alarcon/TW#1	9	1	36	14	36	375
2GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Hoy/EPTC#2	9	1	35	15	38	343
3GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Gutierrez/EPTC#1	8	2	33	17	44	410
4GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC	7	3	35	15	36	382
5GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Ricks/EPTC#5	6	4	29	21	49	399
6GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Fernandez/EPTC#4	5	5	29	21	50	398
7GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Baeza/FB	5	5	25	25	53	386
8GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Abbud/CCC#1	3	7	11	39	84	553
9GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Garcia/EPTC#3	2	8	13	37	77	531
10GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Allen/TW#2	1	9	11	39	83	549
11GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cardenas/CCC#2	0	10	17	33	70	482

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27

Damaris Desbois

usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5

3.27

Becky Mowad

usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5

3.22

Adriana Acosta

usually #1 Singles 24%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 3.5

3.16

Angelina Colquitt

usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3.5

2.72

Ana Baca

usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3

2.71

Angelica Alarcon

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

—

Erika Centeno

usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published —

—

Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza

usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Singles 24% · published —

—

Karla Griffin

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published —

—

Katherine Harrison

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published —

—

Kristen Swanson-Pallares

usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published —

—

Lilly Gutierrez Molina

usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Linda Kern

usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Lucy Pfirman

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Mayra Alvarez-Bernal

usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Melissa Arriola

usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 11% · published —

—

Michele Cicchetti

usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Sofia Saenz

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Kern + Angelina Colquitt	10–16	47% games	−19.0% vs expected
Katherine Harrison + Damaris Desbois	12–9	50% games	not enough data
Angelina Colquitt + Lucy Pfirman	5–6	47% games	not enough data
Lilly Gutierrez Molina + Karla Griffin	9–2	65% games	not enough data
Michele Cicchetti + Mayra Alvarez-Bernal	6–4	52% games	not enough data
Michele Cicchetti + Kristen Swanson-Pallares	6–2	65% games	not enough data
Kristen Swanson-Pallares + Erika Centeno	6–2	57% games	not enough data
Michele Cicchetti + Adriana Acosta	1–5	43% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

Damaris Desbois

71W–44L career · 14 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

3.27

3.5

Becky Mowad

47W–61L career · 17 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

3.27

3.5

Adriana Acosta

36W–39L career · 25 lines in 2026

5%92%2%

3.22

3.5

Angelina Colquitt

58W–61L career · 22 lines in 2026

13%87%1%

3.16

Ana Baca

43W–42L career · 23 lines in 2026

5%92%2%

2.72

Angelica Alarcon

28W–51L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026

7%91%2%

2.71

—

Erika Centeno

36W–25L career · 17 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza

35W–28L career · 32 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Karla Griffin

53W–28L career · 41 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Katherine Harrison

22W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Kristen Swanson-Pallares

76W–36L career · 30 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Lilly Gutierrez Molina

38W–32L career · 41 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Linda Kern

37W–31L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Lucy Pfirman

18W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mayra Alvarez-Bernal

34W–28L career · 28 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Melissa Arriola

36W–29L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Michele Cicchetti

47W–110L career · 27 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sofia Saenz

14W–6L career · 13 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.