Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cardenas/CCC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.20 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-04-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLorena Sosa / Marisol Camara vs Gerla Gallardo / Guadalupe Castillo2-6, 0-6
2026-03-15Lost 01
L#3 DoublesShannon Rhoads / Marisol Camara vs Susan Lyon / Lilia DuRussel1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Alarcon/TW#191361436375
2GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Hoy/EPTC#291351538343
3GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Gutierrez/EPTC#182331744410
4GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC73351536382
5GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Ricks/EPTC#564292149399
6GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Fernandez/EPTC#455292150398
7GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Baeza/FB55252553386
8GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Abbud/CCC#137113984553
9GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Garcia/EPTC#328133777531
10GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Allen/TW#219113983549
11GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cardenas/CCC#2010173370482

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adriana Zaragoza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Cynthia Canales
usually #1 Doubles 79%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.00
Deanna Parson
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Carla Canales
usually #1 Singles 45%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.39
Carmen Cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jill Delaubell
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Kerry Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Laura Houston
usually #1 Singles 90%, also #2 Singles 5% · published
Lorena Sosa
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Marcia Zaragoza
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Marisol Camara
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Samantha Johnson
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
Sandra Alost
published
Sara Acevedo
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Shannon Rhoads
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Stacy Mayo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Tamara Elkins
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Zaragoza + Adriana Zaragoza8556% games+4.5% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Lorena Sosa0830% games−16.7% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Shannon Rhoads22633% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Sosa + Stacy Mayo81644% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Cardenas + Stacy Mayo0925% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Sosa + Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz0932% gamesnot enough data
Sara Acevedo + Stacy Mayo3542% gamesnot enough data
Sara Acevedo + Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz3448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adriana Zaragoza
44W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Cynthia Canales
24W–37L career · 14 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Deanna Parson
17W–11L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Carla Canales
49W–56L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.88
3
Carmen Cardenas
32W–115L career · type A · 20 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39
Jill Delaubell
8W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kerry Gallagher
16W–27L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Houston
49W–21L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lorena Sosa
63W–114L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcia Zaragoza
36W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
18W–68L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marisol Camara
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Johnson
19W–31L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Alost
30W–59L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Acevedo
18W–57L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Rhoads
36W–89L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacy Mayo
47W–94L career · 34 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tamara Elkins
7W–18L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.