Teams

OD 3.5W Reid

2023 NEOTA One-Doubles · NEOTA OD 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-11vs OD 3.5W LurieWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Koehler / Katherine Reid vs Nicole Pinkert / Lauren Roth4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-03vs OD 3.5W LynchLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Dewerth / Sarah Boswell vs Michelle Fox / Kristi Schulte1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-01vs OD 3.5W LightnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Boswell / Katherine Reid vs Hannah Ruddock / Kelsey Ruddock3-6, 4-6
2023-06-25vs OD 3.5W MikolichLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Koehler / Ann Dewerth vs Amanda de Leon / Nicole Mikolich4-6, 4-6
2023-06-24vs OD 3.5W StitzleinLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Koehler / Katherine Reid vs Kathy Stitzlein / Ally Murphy4-6, 5-7
2023-06-07vs OD 3.5W SiegelLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Dewerth / Katherine Reid vs Jennifer Wrubel / Rona Adams-Brody4-6, 3-6
2023-05-30vs OD 3.5W DeBoth FoustLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Boswell / Celia Reid vs Stephanie Sneed / Sally Iuston6-7, 1-6
2023-05-23vs OD 3.5W BeebeWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Koehler / Katherine Reid vs Shelley Beebe / Carol Oglesbee6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA OD 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OD 3.5W DeBoth Foust7171464
2OD 3.5W Lightner6262563
3OD 3.5W Butler6262653
4OD 3.5W Hart5353663
5OD 3.5W O'Shaughnessy5353759
6OD 3.5W Mikolich5353761
7OD 3.5W Siegel5353879
8OD 3.5W Prindle4444863
9OD 3.5W Stitzlein4444874
10OD 3.5W Lynch4444973
11OD 3.5W Scovil35351289
12OD 3.5W Reid26261389
13OD 3.5W Lurie08081692
14OD 3.5W Beebe08081698

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Sarah Boswell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Celia Reid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Nancy Koehler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Ann Dewerth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Katherine Reid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Koehler + Katherine Reid71149% games−1.7% vs expected
Katherine Reid + Ann Dewerth203045% games−2.3% vs expected
Nancy Koehler + Sarah Boswell1543% games−6.4% vs expected
Sarah Boswell + Ann Dewerth4253% gamesnot enough data
Celia Reid + Katherine Reid4161% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Koehler + Ann Dewerth134 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Boswell + Celia Reid033 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Boswell + Katherine Reid123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Boswell
64W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Celia Reid
54W–38L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Koehler
56W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Ann Dewerth
60W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
Katherine Reid
117W–141L career · 5 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.