Teams

OD 3.5W Hart

2023 NEOTA One-Doubles · NEOTA OD 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-18vs OD 3.5W ScovilWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Hart / Marla Silverstein vs Kate Scovil / Jennifer Greer6-3, 6-4
2023-07-11vs OD 3.5W PrindleWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Hart / Bridget Pavlish vs Sharon Prindle / Kathy Mallak6-3, 6-2
2023-06-28vs OD 3.5W BeebeWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarla Silverstein / Bridget Pavlish vs Michelle Frederick / Kristin Hofer7-6, 6-3
2023-06-23vs OD 3.5W O'ShaughnessyLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Hart / Marla Silverstein vs Deborah O'Shaughnessy / Janet Stonehill3-6, 6-7
2023-06-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Hart / Marla Silverstein vs Lori Young / Ann Lynch6-2, 6-1
2023-06-08vs OD 3.5W LurieWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarla Silverstein / Courtney Gile vs Nicole Pinkert / Lauren Roth6-0, 6-1
2023-06-01vs OD 3.5W LightnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Gile / Lindsay Verdova vs Elyse Lightner / Kelsey Ruddock5-7, 0-6
2023-05-28vs OD 3.5W MikolichLost 01
L#1 DoublesBridget Pavlish / Marla Silverstein vs Sara Verespej / Nicole Mikolich1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA OD 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OD 3.5W DeBoth Foust7171464
2OD 3.5W Lightner6262563
3OD 3.5W Butler6262653
4OD 3.5W Hart5353663
5OD 3.5W O'Shaughnessy5353759
6OD 3.5W Mikolich5353761
7OD 3.5W Siegel5353879
8OD 3.5W Prindle4444863
9OD 3.5W Stitzlein4444874
10OD 3.5W Lynch4444973
11OD 3.5W Scovil35351289
12OD 3.5W Reid26261389
13OD 3.5W Lurie08081692
14OD 3.5W Beebe08081698

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Lindsay Verdova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Marla Silverstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Courtney Gile
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Bridget Pavlish
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Wendy Hart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marla Silverstein + Courtney Gile8158% games+13.8% vs expected
Wendy Hart + Marla Silverstein5063% games+12.9% vs expected
Marla Silverstein + Lindsay Verdova5071% games+12.9% vs expected
Bridget Pavlish + Marla Silverstein291255% games+1.7% vs expected
Wendy Hart + Courtney Gile213 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Hart + Lindsay Verdova303 matchesnot enough data
Bridget Pavlish + Lindsay Verdova123 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Gile + Lindsay Verdova213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Verdova
48W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Marla Silverstein
94W–49L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Courtney Gile
34W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Bridget Pavlish
73W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Wendy Hart
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.