Teams

KC NAVY

2022 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-20vs SSH MAROONWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Knudsen / Lisa Cutter vs Marsha Visscher / Monica Linnell6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAllison Rothwell vs Meghan Pomeroy6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLacey McMurry / Jennifer DHaenens vs Danielle Perkins / Sara Haynes6-7, 4-6
2022-07-18vs KC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Riley / Lisa Cutter vs Kelly Zibell / Amy McFarland6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-07-13vs LTFC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Raban / Kathy Knudsen vs Christianne Blevins / Cindy Louder1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer DHaenens vs Margo Beck0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Rothwell / Sheila Riley vs Julie Greene / Anne O'Brien5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-07-04vs HV ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Knudsen / Janet Raban vs Margot Labree / Wendy Stookesberry4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer DHaenens / Allison Rothwell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-22vs WC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Cutter / Kathy Knudsen vs Melissa Heimbaugh / Lauren Love6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAllison Rothwell / Lacey McMurry vs Jessica Crandall Snyder / Danielle Nichols6-1, 6-1
2022-06-15vs HW GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Cutter / Jennifer DHaenens vs Heather Prier / Whitney Vancil0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLacey McMurry vs McKay Pittman0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSheila Riley / Janet Raban vs Fawna Kritzer / Jessica Garnreiter0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings93 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GAC RED701926111
2LPTC BLUE701839125
3SSHP RED7017410136
4LEBTC RED7017411106
5PCC BLUE7016512131
6LAC BLUE601539115
7NJ GREEN6117410103
8KC GREEN6117411132
9PTC RED6117411101
10SKY BLUE6115612120
11PH GREEN6115612121
12WC NAVY6116512128
13GTC BLUE6116513152
14KC SILVER6116513151
15EM RED6115614150
16SSH TEAL5214715146
17PRC BLUE5214716134
18WP NAVY5213817175
19EM GREEN5214717152
20RHCC RED5213818166
21SSLT TEAL5213818166
22VC BLUE5213819166
23CCV RED5213820169
24NJ SILVER5213820177
25KC RED5212921173
26DTC RED52111022171
27CHCC NAVY5212926199
28TTA BLUE4211715136
29SKY RED4313818159
30ATC YELLOW4315618148
31CVTA RED4312920155
32LTFC RED4312920177
33NJ ORANGE4313820174
34WC GREEN4312921168
35VCC RED43111021145
36CACM BLUE43111023192
37BCST BLUE43111023188
38GAC GREEN43101123179
39GNO BLUE43101125180
40HV ORANGE43101126202
41MEA GOLD3310817131
42LEBTC PINK3310817117
43RCC BLUE339919147
44SSH YELLOW3381021177
45RCC GREEN3381021166
46CCV GREEN3412922154
47RHCC BLUE34101123175
48HW GREEN34101123163
49HG RED34101123163
50BM GREEN3491224183
51WP GREEN3491225173
52RMTC GREEN34101125158
53SSH MAROON34101125178
54HV PURPLE3481326180
55KC NAVY3481326169
56CACM GREEN3491226191
57EM NAVY3491226187
58WP YELLOW3491226192
59LEBTC BLUE3491227204
60WP RED3491227188
61BCST RED3481328205
62MVCC GREEN3471429190
63BRMST BLUE2481020159
64NJ YELLOW2481023170
65NJ RED2461225177
66KC GOLD25101123181
67CM BLUE2591225184
68SSLT NAVY2581326185
69HW BLUE2581326192
70VCC GREEN2581328200
71HIW RED2581329210
72WC RED2581329214
73SSLT YELLOW2561530188
74BM RED2561531213
75CCV NAVY2561531193
76BM NAVY2561531194
77SH RED2571432222
78HIW NAVY2551633215
79HFII RED1541429192
80RMTC RED1531533211
81DTC BLUE1671431216
82GR RED1661532219
83GCC BLUE1661532208
84SV ORANGE1651632224
85TTA RED1661533221
86EM SILVER1651633213
87NJ BLACK1651634219
88CM RED1641734218
89CCV BLUE1631837233
90KC BLUE0531225156
91SSG BLUE0641428191
92MC RED0751634211
93CPV BLUE0741735214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Jennifer DHaenens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.26
Lacey McMurry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Allison Rothwell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Janet Raban
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathy Knudsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Cutter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Knudsen + Lisa Cutter6547% games+4.3% vs expected
Lacey McMurry + Jennifer DHaenens91743% games−1.1% vs expected
Janet Raban + Kathy Knudsen1434% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jennifer DHaenens
38W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
2.5
Lacey McMurry
43W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.26
Allison Rothwell
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Raban
5W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Knudsen
8W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Cutter
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.