Teams

HIW NAVY

2022 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-20vs RHCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jones / Sandra Gilbert vs Corinne Packard / Tessa Vickers4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesWendy Turman vs Abbey Wood2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesElan Lantz / Carrie DiCanio vs Melissa Argenti / Lori Komon6-0, 6-4
2022-07-13vs BP REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Turman / Carrie DiCanio vs Angela Martin / Deb Hall6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSandra Gilbert vs Kelli E Barker2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesErin Coors / Elan Lantz vs Brandy Echery / Nancy Thompson2-6, 4-6
2022-07-10vs RHCC BLUEWon 20
W#1 SinglesWendy Turman vs Liz Mercado6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarrie DiCanio / Elan Lantz vs Cheryl Crawford / Lori Komon6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2022-07-06vs LPTC BLUELost 02
L#1 SinglesSandra Gilbert vs Michelle Dolin0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Benson / Erin Coors vs Casey Tatum / Kay Newman3-6, 4-6
2022-06-29vs NJ BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesErin Coors / Carrie DiCanio vs Karen Stanley / Laura Yonamine7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSandra Gilbert vs Eryn Johnson0-6, 2-6
2022-06-22vs NJ ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesElan Lantz / Brenda Park vs Tracey Perry / Shannon Hempelman0-2, 0-0
L#1 SinglesSandra Gilbert vs Kristin Walters0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesErin Coors / Michelle Jones vs Cassandra Thompson / Aline Pitney6-3, 6-4
2022-06-08vs BP REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jones / Elan Lantz vs Angela Martin / Nancy Thompson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings93 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GAC RED701926111
2LPTC BLUE701839125
3SSHP RED7017410136
4LEBTC RED7017411106
5PCC BLUE7016512131
6LAC BLUE601539115
7NJ GREEN6117410103
8KC GREEN6117411132
9PTC RED6117411101
10SKY BLUE6115612120
11PH GREEN6115612121
12WC NAVY6116512128
13GTC BLUE6116513152
14KC SILVER6116513151
15EM RED6115614150
16SSH TEAL5214715146
17PRC BLUE5214716134
18WP NAVY5213817175
19EM GREEN5214717152
20RHCC RED5213818166
21SSLT TEAL5213818166
22VC BLUE5213819166
23CCV RED5213820169
24NJ SILVER5213820177
25KC RED5212921173
26DTC RED52111022171
27CHCC NAVY5212926199
28TTA BLUE4211715136
29SKY RED4313818159
30ATC YELLOW4315618148
31CVTA RED4312920155
32LTFC RED4312920177
33NJ ORANGE4313820174
34WC GREEN4312921168
35VCC RED43111021145
36CACM BLUE43111023192
37BCST BLUE43111023188
38GAC GREEN43101123179
39GNO BLUE43101125180
40HV ORANGE43101126202
41MEA GOLD3310817131
42LEBTC PINK3310817117
43RCC BLUE339919147
44SSH YELLOW3381021177
45RCC GREEN3381021166
46CCV GREEN3412922154
47RHCC BLUE34101123175
48HW GREEN34101123163
49HG RED34101123163
50BM GREEN3491224183
51WP GREEN3491225173
52RMTC GREEN34101125158
53SSH MAROON34101125178
54HV PURPLE3481326180
55KC NAVY3481326169
56CACM GREEN3491226191
57EM NAVY3491226187
58WP YELLOW3491226192
59LEBTC BLUE3491227204
60WP RED3491227188
61BCST RED3481328205
62MVCC GREEN3471429190
63BRMST BLUE2481020159
64NJ YELLOW2481023170
65NJ RED2461225177
66KC GOLD25101123181
67CM BLUE2591225184
68SSLT NAVY2581326185
69HW BLUE2581326192
70VCC GREEN2581328200
71HIW RED2581329210
72WC RED2581329214
73SSLT YELLOW2561530188
74BM RED2561531213
75CCV NAVY2561531193
76BM NAVY2561531194
77SH RED2571432222
78HIW NAVY2551633215
79HFII RED1541429192
80RMTC RED1531533211
81DTC BLUE1671431216
82GR RED1661532219
83GCC BLUE1661532208
84SV ORANGE1651632224
85TTA RED1661533221
86EM SILVER1651633213
87NJ BLACK1651634219
88CM RED1641734218
89CCV BLUE1631837233
90KC BLUE0531225156
91SSG BLUE0641428191
92MC RED0751634211
93CPV BLUE0741735214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.25
Erin Coors
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Carrie DiCanio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Elan Lantz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Wendy Turman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Sandra Gilbert
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Turman + Carrie DiCanio1446% games+4.1% vs expected
Elan Lantz + Carrie DiCanio213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Erin Coors
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Carrie DiCanio
6W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Elan Lantz
7W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Wendy Turman
21W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Gilbert
3W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.