Teams

NITA E 40W18a Naperville TC (Madura)

2023 NITA1 ESL Adult 18 & Over · NITA ESL 18 & Over 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesGretchen Langer / Tracy Gallo vs Sylwia Rakauskas / Simona Fojtikova6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNoelle Tepas / Jeanne Johnson vs Wendy Pochocki / Valerie Collopy6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSue Keough / Teri Andersen vs Lisa Franco / Mary Richardson-Webb6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesCarole Liang / Gretchen Langer vs Lori Bijonowski / MEREDITH BETTCHER2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTiffany Oken vs Donna Matkovic7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTeri Andersen / Claire Ralphs vs Margaret Logsdon / Cheri Medus4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSue Keough / Todra Oken vs Vicki Mitchell / Valerie Nagel1-6, 0-6
2022-11-05vs NITA E 40W18b TAM (Farinas)Split 22
L#1 DoublesTodra Oken / Tracy Gallo vs Huan Chang / Courtney Tornow1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTiffany Oken vs Ruth Karakosta3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNoelle Tepas / Jeanne Johnson vs Jessica Grizzell / Kitty Swanson1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTeri Andersen / Claire Ralphs vs Danielle Balzano / Ashley Boduch6-3, 6-4
2022-10-22vs NITA E 40W18e Rush Copley (Stine)Won 40
W#1 DoublesTiffany Oken / Todra Oken vs Michelle Dougherty / Dorothy OMalley6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAllison Genovese vs Denise Rippetoe-Reed6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarole Liang / Gretchen Langer vs Sandy Peters / Milada Vedrova6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNoelle Tepas / Jeanne Johnson vs Elena Kovalenko / Larissa Podstavkova6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesTiffany Oken / Gretchen Langer vs Kelly Good / Janet Wolf2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTracy Gallo vs Jean Ma7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTeri Andersen / Claire Ralphs vs Rebecca Bosack / Lisa Rowen2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Skryd / Sue Keough vs Jane Strien / Mary Sullivan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesTodra Oken / Martha Skryd vs Julie Steinberg / Erica Eisner3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesTiffany Oken vs Ginger Riessen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTeri Andersen / Jeanne Johnson vs Anna Dau / Leah Starkman0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NITA ESL 18 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 40W18c Heritage TC (Campanelli/Jurczyk)6018614134
2NITA E 40W18g Norris Center (Saguto)5117718163
3NITA E 40W18d Score (Bianchi/Knutte)4217719169
4NITA E 40W18b TAM (Farinas)3315923188
5NITA E 40W18a Naperville TC (Madura)24121226219
6NITA E 40W18e Rush Copley (Stine)1542040237
7NITA E 40W18h Oak Lawn RC (Gaynor)0612347285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claire Ralphs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Gretchen Langer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Tiffany Oken
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.61
Tracy Gallo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.50
Martha Skryd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Carole Liang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Noelle Tepas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Allison Genovese
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Sue Keough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Teri Andersen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jeanne Johnson
published
Katherine Knapp
published
Kris Madura
published
Todra Oken
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Skryd + Todra Oken111743% games+4.8% vs expected
Teri Andersen + Claire Ralphs3447% games+1.2% vs expected
Teri Andersen + Katherine Knapp2347% games+0.1% vs expected
Martha Skryd + Sue Keough4746% games−1.1% vs expected
Tiffany Oken + Todra Oken5947% games−2.3% vs expected
Teri Andersen + Martha Skryd2833% games−3.4% vs expected
Gretchen Langer + Todra Oken1433% games−4.5% vs expected
Carole Liang + Gretchen Langer4449% games−4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Claire Ralphs
24W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Gretchen Langer
23W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tiffany Oken
64W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
Tracy Gallo
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Martha Skryd
87W–123L career · 2 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Carole Liang
34W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Noelle Tepas
12W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Allison Genovese
95W–90L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Sue Keough
57W–110L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Teri Andersen
35W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Jeanne Johnson
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Knapp
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kris Madura
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Todra Oken
31W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.