Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Ahman)(EPCC#2)

2022 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE · 3.5 ADULT WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Loizeaux-Witte / Heather Hall vs Jacquelyn Gouveia / Brenda Wautlet6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBerenice Loubet vs Jennifer Bush6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAna Barrio / Cathy Castro vs Celia Al-Tahan / Lourdes Olivas6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesNicole Ahmann / Berenice Loubet vs Kathy Cartwright / Karen McVay4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLilia DuRussel / Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte vs Anna Camille Kerr / Laura Leslie2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCindy Miles / Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa vs Shirley Cervantes / Lisa Selby3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesLilia DuRussel / Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa vs Marisol Ramirez / Bertha Gutierrez6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBerenice Loubet vs MARIA GUADALUPE CENICEROS7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAna Laura Chavez A / Ana Barrio vs Sonia Rangel / Lourdes Romero2-6, 1-6
2022-01-23vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Akers)(EPTC#3)Won 31
W#1 DoublesLilia DuRussel / Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte vs Patricia Samonte / Jeanne Saunders6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAna Barrio vs Bianca Loya5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Ahmann / Berenice Loubet vs Lourdes Livingston / Dina Schlotterbeck6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Rome / Renee Neessen vs Betty Daniel / Carolyn Hauser6-2, 7-6
2022-01-16vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)Split 22
L#1 DoublesAna Laura Chavez A / Cindy Miles vs Jammie Price / Diane Lunghi1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAna Barrio vs Stephanie Beckles0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Ahmann / Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte vs Patricia Jacobes / Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Julieta Hall-Ochoa / Elizabeth Rome vs Sharon Ransom / Leticia Augsberger6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5 ADULT WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Cartwright)(EPCC#1)8025716191
2GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Uribe)(FB)7127514183
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Olmos))(EPTC#4)6223925248
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Akers)(EPTC#3)44161632264
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Allen)(TW)44161635260
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Abbud)(CCC#1)35122043325
7GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)2692350348
8GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Cardenas)(CCC#2)2672551348
9GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Ahman)(EPCC#2)000000
10GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Guierrez)(EPTC#2)0892351350

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Berenice Loubet
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.79
Cathy Castro
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.65
Ana Barrio
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3
2.62
Ana Laura Chavez A
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.31
Cindy Miles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Rome
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lilia DuRussel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nicole Ahmann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Renee Neessen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Rome + Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte4167% games+11.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Rome + Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa6166% games+7.8% vs expected
Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte + Lilia DuRussel3939% games−2.1% vs expected
Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa + Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte61146% games−2.6% vs expected
Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa + Ana Laura Chavez A5450% games−5.5% vs expected
Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa + Lilia DuRussel2449% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Ahmann + Lilia DuRussel2352% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Ahmann + Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Berenice Loubet
33W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Cathy Castro
37W–63L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Ana Barrio
19W–63L career · 10 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Ana Laura Chavez A
25W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
2.5
Cindy Miles
21W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%93%7%
2.31
Elizabeth Rome
33W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lilia DuRussel
28W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa
67W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Ahmann
50W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Renee Neessen
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte
41W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.