Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Akers)(EPTC#3)

2022 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE · 3.5 ADULT WOMEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
W#1 DoublesDebra Pate / Cezy Collins vs Melissa Isaac / Jacquelyn Gouveia7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBianca Loya vs Jennifer Bush6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBetty Daniel / Carolyn Hauser vs Celia Al-Tahan / Lourdes Olivas3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Samonte / Jeanne Saunders vs Brenda Wautlet / Anita Boss7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEdina Salazar vs Rebecca Spencer Tavitas0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Michnovicz / Lori McGuire vs Wendy Bloss / Karen McVay6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEllen Hughes / Dina Schlotterbeck vs Joey Hass / Anna Camille Kerr3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-02-27vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Guierrez)(EPTC#2)Split 11
L#1 DoublesEllen Michnovicz / Lori McGuire vs Marisol Ramirez / Lorena Chavez6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEdina Salazar vs MARIA GUADALUPE CENICEROS6-1, 7-5
2022-02-20vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Abbud)(CCC#1)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJeanne Saunders / Ellen Hughes vs Claudia Abbud / Sandra Alost6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBianca Loya vs Georgina Munoz6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Mehl / Lourdes Livingston vs Elizabeth Edmunds / Shelley Danforth6-0, 7-5
2022-02-13vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesCezy Collins / Patricia Mehl vs Esther Orona / Jammie Price6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEdina Salazar vs Diane Lunghi6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEllen Michnovicz / Dina Schlotterbeck vs Patricia Jacobes / Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Hauser / Betty Daniel vs Sharon Ransom / Vera Ray4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-02-06vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Allen)(TW)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesEdina Salazar vs Meghan Jones3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Samonte / Lourdes Livingston vs Bertha Allen / Christa de Regules3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLori McGuire / Ellen Michnovicz vs Marykathleen Towle / Laura Orozco6-4, 6-3
2022-01-30vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Olmos))(EPTC#4)Lost 13
W#1 DoublesJudy Sweetnam / Jeanne Saunders vs A C / Blanca Olmos6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBianca Loya vs Alejandra Ostos1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Mehl / Lourdes Livingston vs Dolly Ricks / Teresa Nevarez1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLori McGuire / Ellen Michnovicz vs Lori DeLisser / Gabriela Zubiate4-6, 3-6
2022-01-23vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Ahman)(EPCC#2)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesPatricia Samonte / Jeanne Saunders vs Lilia DuRussel / Suzanne Loizeaux-Witte3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBianca Loya vs Ana Barrio7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLourdes Livingston / Dina Schlotterbeck vs Nicole Ahmann / Berenice Loubet0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBetty Daniel / Carolyn Hauser vs Elizabeth Rome / Renee Neessen2-6, 6-7
2022-01-16vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Uribe)(FB)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesCezy Collins / Lourdes Livingston vs Patricia Dalbin / Rossana Roacho1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEdina Salazar vs Patricia Uribe6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPatricia Mehl / Lori McGuire vs Ramona Beard / Selena Solis6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebra Pate / Jeanne Saunders vs Esther Fierro / Judith Martinez1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Hughes / Diane Allen vs Juliet Mattingly / Linda Lapointe7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesEdina Salazar vs Melissa Isaac7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesDebra Pate / Jeanne Saunders vs Kathy Cartwright / Karen McVay6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEdina Salazar vs Shirley Cervantes6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5 ADULT WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Cartwright)(EPCC#1)8025716191
2GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Uribe)(FB)7127514183
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Olmos))(EPTC#4)6223925248
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Akers)(EPTC#3)44161632264
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Allen)(TW)44161635260
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Abbud)(CCC#1)35122043325
7GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)2692350348
8GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Cardenas)(CCC#2)2672551348
9GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Ahman)(EPCC#2)000000
10GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Guierrez)(EPTC#2)0892351350

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Bianca Loya
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.11
Ellen Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Edina Salazar
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3
2.80
Ellen Michnovicz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Debra Pate
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Dina Schlotterbeck
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3
Betty Daniel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Carolyn Hauser
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Cezy Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne Saunders
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jordan Bryant
published
Lori McGuire
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Lourdes Livingston
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Patricia Mehl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Patricia Samonte
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Michnovicz + Lori McGuire91147% games+3.9% vs expected
Lourdes Livingston + Ellen Hughes8648% games−2.6% vs expected
Betty Daniel + Carolyn Hauser1645% games−19.0% vs expected
Ellen Michnovicz + Dina Schlotterbeck3348% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Samonte + Dina Schlotterbeck044 matchesnot enough data
Debra Pate + Jeanne Saunders213 matchesnot enough data
Lourdes Livingston + Patricia Mehl123 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Saunders + Ellen Hughes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bianca Loya
42W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Ellen Hughes
76W–84L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Edina Salazar
40W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3.5
Ellen Michnovicz
45W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Debra Pate
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Dina Schlotterbeck
62W–81L career · 11 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Betty Daniel
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Carolyn Hauser
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Cezy Collins
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeanne Saunders
25W–14L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jordan Bryant
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori McGuire
36W–86L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lourdes Livingston
47W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Mehl
20W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Samonte
28W–67L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.