Teams

SFV - Kiss My Ace

2023 Adult 18+ SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.72 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-10vs SFV - Paseo TribeLost 01
L#3 DoublesStella Dumlao-Idea / Andrea Jayasekera vs Monique Reyes / Sara Lavalle4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-03vs SFV - Shadow's AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesStella Dumlao-Idea / Sharon Spangler vs Nancy Ray / Sandra Zane5-7, 1-6
2023-05-06vs SFV - Simply Smashing 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesLarissa Kazantsev / Andrea Jayasekera vs Summer Williamson / Allison Mac Ewan6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Abbey Everson
published 4
3.87
Sara Heum
published 4
3.77
Teri Gustafson
published 4
3.72
Raizzi Rodriguez
published 4
3.58
Rumduol Vuong
published 4
3.21
Azatuhi Chinaryan
published 3.5
3.15
Diana Massaria
published 3.5
2.98
Andrea Jayasekera
published 3.5
2.87
Felicia Yu
published
2.83
Stella Dumlao-Idea
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Larissa Kazantsev
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Sharon Spangler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rumduol Vuong + Sara Heum3253% games+2.7% vs expected
Teri Gustafson + Sara Heum6356% gamesnot enough data
Teri Gustafson + Raizzi Rodriguez4454% gamesnot enough data
Sara Heum + Raizzi Rodriguez5259% gamesnot enough data
Rumduol Vuong + Teri Gustafson2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abbey Everson
157W–106L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Sara Heum
122W–69L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Teri Gustafson
84W–67L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Raizzi Rodriguez
94W–70L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Rumduol Vuong
57W–56L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Azatuhi Chinaryan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Diana Massaria
20W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Andrea Jayasekera
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
Felicia Yu
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.87
3
Stella Dumlao-Idea
180W–184L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Larissa Kazantsev
74W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Sharon Spangler
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.