Teams

MEMPK ITEN

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-21vs PBTC TUCKERSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKayla Breedlove / Nancy Barker vs Rochelle Beier-Kemmet / Leah Ann Tucker6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulia Hershey / Jessica Strickland vs Jeannette Ortiz / Ursula Duran4-6, 3-6
2024-05-20vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 01
L#3 DoublesKayla Breedlove / Jessica Strickland vs Melissa Morino / Jamie Roach4-6, 1-6
2024-05-13vs CSRC EMERSONLost 02
L#2 DoublesNancy Barker / Kayla Breedlove vs Patty Carpenter / Sandra Cook4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulia Hershey / Jessica Strickland vs Vikki ONeil / Candace McCollett3-6, 2-6
2024-04-29vs FLYHS LEVKUSWon 10
W#3 DoublesBonnie Iten / Julia Hershey vs Kristi Creps / Catherine Mast6-2, 6-4
2024-04-22vs CSRC EMERSONSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBonnie Iten / Kayla Breedlove vs Roni Schlagel / Patty Carpenter6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulia Hershey / Jessica Strickland vs DARLENE WARMOUTH / Sandra Cook4-6, 6-7
2024-04-15vs PBTC TUCKERLost 02
L#2 DoublesKayla Breedlove / Bonnie Iten vs Leah Ann Tucker / Alyssa Parga5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Strickland / Julia Hershey vs Julie Larson / Jeannette Ortiz4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Nancy Barker
published
3.76
Noriko Moody
published
3.73
Stefanie McCarron
published
3.69
Bonnie Iten
published 4
3.67
Kayla Breedlove
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
Julia Hershey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Maggie Hartman
published
Shinobu Voss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Hershey + Bonnie Iten4153% gamesnot enough data
Kayla Breedlove + Bonnie Iten213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Barker
54W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
Noriko Moody
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Stefanie McCarron
33W–28L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Bonnie Iten
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Kayla Breedlove
43W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Julia Hershey
39W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Maggie Hartman
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.33
Shinobu Voss
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.