Teams

Combs - Gates Four

2024 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-23vs Ciccone- Highland Country ClubWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Freidt / Betty Peterson vs Tyler Chavonne / Courtney McDaniel6-0, 6-3
2024-07-10vs Hasty - Highland Country ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesBetty Peterson / Mari Lesniak vs Averi Brown / Lyndsey Gardner3-6, 3-6
2024-06-11vs Resseguie - MazarickWon 10
W#3 DoublesBetty Peterson / Barbara Freidt vs KiAnna Duncan / Deborah Baker6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-04vs Hasty - Highland Country ClubWon 10
W#3 DoublesBetty Peterson / Barbara Freidt vs Averi Brown / Blair McCallman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amanda Maxey
published 4
3.11
Kathy Fick
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.08
Yvonne Rouse
published
3.02
Lynn Floyd
published
2.90
Corinna Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Tammy Keller
published
2.71
Barbara Freidt
published 3
2.60
Betty Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.55
Gwenda Combs
published
2.44
Mari Lesniak
published
2.33
Wendy Vonnegut
published
Sandra Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yvonne Rouse + Tammy Keller4448% gamesnot enough data
Corinna Williamson + Kathy Fick2546% gamesnot enough data
Corinna Williamson + Tammy Keller3257% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Floyd + Corinna Williamson134 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Floyd + Tammy Keller134 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Rouse + Corinna Williamson224 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Rouse + Kathy Fick224 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Rouse + Betty Peterson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Maxey
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Kathy Fick
126W–95L career · 7 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
Yvonne Rouse
27W–28L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Lynn Floyd
33W–45L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Corinna Williamson
122W–100L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
Tammy Keller
24W–30L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Barbara Freidt
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
2.5
Betty Peterson
38W–91L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%25%75%
2.60
Gwenda Combs
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Mari Lesniak
16W–24L career · no lines in 2024
0%67%33%
2.44
Wendy Vonnegut
9W–20L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.33
Sandra Jones
27W–27L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.