Teams

Lincoln White Team

2026 NE Adult 18&Over · 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-29vs Lincoln Red TeamLost 12
L#1 DoublesPiyush Srivastav / Tyler Bordeaux vs John Klotz / Peter Tran4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDrew Miller / Habinh Lee vs Kristopher Williams / Stephen Henry2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Deming / Nathan He vs Alan Givens / Daniel Brailita7-6, 7-6
2026-08-22vs Lincoln Red TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesTyler Bordeaux / Travis Figard vs Kristopher Williams / Peter Tran1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Drust Iii / Tyler Coleman vs David Clark / Stephen Henry1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDrew Miller / Matthew Kataoka vs David Diamant / Alan Givens4-6, 3-6
2026-08-15vs Lincoln Red TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesHabinh Lee / Charles Deming vs Alan Givens / Peter Tran7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDrew Miller / Nathan He vs Dan Inman / Kristopher Williams3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPiyush Srivastav / Travis Figard vs Daniel Brailita / David Diamant0-6, 1-6
2026-08-01vs Lincoln Red TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Kataoka / Habinh Lee vs Alan Givens / Dan Inman7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTyler Coleman / Charles Deming vs Daniel Brailita / David Clark6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPiyush Srivastav / Tyler Bordeaux vs John Klotz / Stephen Henry6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-25vs Lincoln Red TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Drust Iii / Charles Deming vs Dan Inman / Kristopher Williams4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Kataoka / Nathan He vs Alan Givens / David Clark3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTyler Coleman / Habinh Lee vs David Diamant / John Klotz1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lincoln White Team3072563
2Lincoln Red Team032715102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Tammy Tegler
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.83
Charles Deming
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Tyler Bordeaux
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Matthew Kataoka
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Nathan He
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Piyush Srivastav
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Travis Figard
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
2.57
Tyler Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Habinh Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Robert Drust Iii
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Zachary Tegler
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Tegler
126W–156L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.83
3
Charles Deming
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Tyler Bordeaux
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Matthew Kataoka
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.72
Nathan He
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Piyush Srivastav
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Travis Figard
4W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
Tyler Coleman
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Habinh Lee
2W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Robert Drust Iii
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zachary Tegler
53W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.