Teams

Lincoln Red Team

2026 NE Adult 18&Over · 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-22vs Lincoln White TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristopher Williams / Peter Tran vs Tyler Bordeaux / Travis Figard6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Diamant / Alan Givens vs Drew Miller / Matthew Kataoka6-4, 6-3
2026-08-15vs Lincoln White TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlan Givens / Peter Tran vs Habinh Lee / Charles Deming5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDan Inman / Kristopher Williams vs Drew Miller / Nathan He6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Brailita / David Diamant vs Piyush Srivastav / Travis Figard6-0, 6-1
2026-08-01vs Lincoln White TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlan Givens / Dan Inman vs Matthew Kataoka / Habinh Lee6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Brailita / David Clark vs Tyler Coleman / Charles Deming7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Klotz / Stephen Henry vs Piyush Srivastav / Tyler Bordeaux3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-25vs Lincoln White TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesDan Inman / Kristopher Williams vs Robert Drust Iii / Charles Deming6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlan Givens / David Clark vs Matthew Kataoka / Nathan He6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Diamant / John Klotz vs Tyler Coleman / Habinh Lee6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lincoln White Team3072563
2Lincoln Red Team032715102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Tammy Tegler
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.00
David Diamant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Kristopher Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Daniel Brailita
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
David Clark
published 3
2.59
John Klotz
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Singles 44% · published
2.56
Dan Inman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Alan Givens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Peter Tran
published
Zachary Tegler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Givens + John Klotz0622% games−11.8% vs expected
Alan Givens + Dan Inman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Tegler
125W–155L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
3
David Diamant
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kristopher Williams
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Daniel Brailita
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
David Clark
10W–50L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
John Klotz
6W–28L career · 9 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
3
Dan Inman
5W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Alan Givens
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Peter Tran
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Zachary Tegler
53W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.