Teams

WHRC-Crossley

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ahmad Garakani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Richard Crossley
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Results7 ties
2018-11-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Crossley / Giles Clay vs Jack Griffin / Glenn Gerstmar7-5, 6-4
2018-11-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Crossley / Steve Martini vs Todd DeNeffe / Stewart Bartlett6-4, 6-2
2018-11-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLarry Bangerter / Richard Crossley vs Chris Grenzer / Mitchell Strauss6-2, 6-2
2018-10-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesGiles Clay / Richard Crossley vs Mike Farrell / Mike Reiss7-5, 6-4
2018-10-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Crossley / Robert Anderson vs Glenn Gerstmar / Brian Leahy6-1, 6-1
2018-10-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Crossley / Giles Clay vs Kit Johnson / William Hergenhan6-4, 7-6
2018-10-07Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGiles Clay / Richard Crossley vs Jack Schunk / Charlie Dolezal4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChris Fahlbusch / Ahmad Garakani vs Mitchell Strauss / Mike McNairy1-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Ahmad Garakani
47W–39L career
not enough data
4
Richard Crossley
66W–67L career
6%94%0%
3.66

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.