Teams

MEA TEAL

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.86 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs LAC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzette Stern / Sara Oclassen vs Kelly Mcreynolds / Christine Payne0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Noble / Kathleen Lupo vs Judith Laursen / Paulette Medley0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNikki Boye / Ania Brakhage vs Mona Jones / Kim Kadlic1-6, 2-6
2022-07-11vs BRMST BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathleen Lupo / Ande Bernthal vs Ursula Duran / Michelle Schulz7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCurry Rosato vs Melissa Clarke2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNikki Boye / Fran Katnik vs Jacy Bowers / Christine Babcock6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnia Brakhage / Paige Noble vs Laura Tedesco / Jane Davis1-6, 6-7
2022-07-04vs RMTC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesKathleen Lupo / Fran Katnik vs Jean Crawford / Jennifer Ufland2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCurry Rosato vs Allison Becker1-2
L#2 DoublesAnde Bernthal / Paige Noble vs Elizabeth Korevaar / Lynea Olson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNikki Boye / Ania Brakhage vs Carol Gregory / Heather Smith3-6, 2-6
2022-06-27vs BCC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesHilary Wallace / Fran Katnik vs Wendi Hill / Victoria Scordo1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCurry Rosato vs Katherine Beeck6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPaige Noble / Ande Bernthal vs Janine Londa / Michelle Gallop2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSuzette Stern / Kathleen Lupo vs Julia McNeal / Leslie Herz1-6, 5-7
2022-06-20vs BTA REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesHilary Wallace / Kathleen Lupo vs Lisa Desmarais / Liza Tuttle4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCurry Rosato vs Lynne Buhlig6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnia Brakhage / Nancy Travis vs Rachel Bloombaum / Dewi Win6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaige Noble / Sara Oclassen vs Donna Louie / Mary Dowling6-7, 1-6
2022-06-13vs LTA ORANGEWon 31
W#1 DoublesFran Katnik / Nancy Travis vs Gretchen Blair / KATIE Lehr7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCurry Rosato vs Stephanie Mockler6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen Lupo / Ania Brakhage vs Maureen Hartigan / Shannon Weisblatt7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSara Oclassen / Suzette Stern vs Debra Heiser / Jody Reenan6-7, 3-6
2022-06-06vs MEA BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesAnde Bernthal / Hilary Wallace vs Kirsten Roeber / Lisa Bartley2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCurry Rosato vs Lydia Moy4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Lupo / Nancy Travis vs Janet Dilz / Paulette Witte6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzette Stern / Sara Oclassen vs Linda Creek / Emma Brandt1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Fran Katnik
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Kathleen Lupo
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.79
Ande Bernthal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Curry Rosato
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
Nancy Travis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Nikki Boye
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Suzette Stern
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Sara Oclassen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Ania Brakhage
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Paige Noble
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ande Bernthal + Nikki Boye11949% games+4.0% vs expected
Fran Katnik + Kathleen Lupo8255% games−1.1% vs expected
Ania Brakhage + Sara Oclassen1440% games−2.5% vs expected
Suzette Stern + Sara Oclassen4943% games−7.9% vs expected
Fran Katnik + Suzette Stern123 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Lupo + Nancy Travis123 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Lupo + Suzette Stern123 matchesnot enough data
Ania Brakhage + Nikki Boye033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Fran Katnik
29W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Kathleen Lupo
55W–33L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Ande Bernthal
27W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Curry Rosato
26W–16L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Nancy Travis
26W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Nikki Boye
18W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Suzette Stern
6W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Sara Oclassen
11W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Ania Brakhage
9W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Paige Noble
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.