Teams

LAC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs MEA TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Mcreynolds / Christine Payne vs Suzette Stern / Sara Oclassen6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJudith Laursen / Paulette Medley vs Paige Noble / Kathleen Lupo6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMona Jones / Kim Kadlic vs Nikki Boye / Ania Brakhage6-1, 6-2
2022-07-11vs BTA REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesJudith Laursen / Lydia Wuensch vs Rachel Bloombaum / Liza Tuttle2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPaulette Medley vs Lynne Buhlig6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Mcreynolds / Christine Payne vs Lisa Desmarais / Anna Carner6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Mona Jones vs Peggy Ingraham / Dewi Win6-4, 6-4
2022-07-07vs LTA ORANGEWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichelle Pulley / Lydia Wuensch vs Jody Reenan / Dennette Stroh6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesPaulette Medley vs Stephanie Mockler6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Mcreynolds / Christine Payne vs Maureen Hartigan / Shannon Weisblatt5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMona Jones / Paula Nelsen vs Megan Dahlstrom / KATIE Lehr6-2, 6-1
2022-06-27vs MEA BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesKim Kadlic / Lydia Wuensch vs Kirsten Roeber / Patricia Jamison6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPaulette Medley vs Paulette Witte6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Galloway / Michelle Pulley vs Leslie Walters / Katherine Spines6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMona Jones / Christine Payne vs Lydia Moy / Beth Cendali6-4, 6-1
2022-06-20vs BCC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Pulley / Christina Cope vs Wendi Hill / Victoria Scordo4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPaulette Medley vs Katherine Beeck6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLydia Wuensch / Kim Kadlic vs Victoria McCarthy / Michelle Gallop3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Galloway / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Julia McNeal / Audrey Chivukula6-1, 6-0
2022-06-13vs BRMST BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesMelissa Bonnette / Kim Kadlic vs Ursula Duran / Michelle Schulz3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPaulette Medley vs Jacy Bowers6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelly Mcreynolds / Christine Payne vs Laura Tedesco / Stacy May6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMona Jones / Paula Nelsen vs Christine Babcock / Kathy Schmidt6-3, 6-4
2022-06-06vs RMTC BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesChristine Payne / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Allison Becker / Jean Crawford4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPaulette Medley vs Heather Smith6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Pulley / Christina Cope vs Ruth Weinberg / Veronique Foulon6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobin Galloway / Melissa Bonnette vs Carol Gregory / Jennifer Ufland6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kelly Mcreynolds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Christina Cope
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Kim Kadlic
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Mona Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Paula Nelsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Robin Galloway
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Lydia Wuensch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Melissa Bonnette
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Michelle Pulley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Judith Laursen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Paulette Medley
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Nelsen + Lydia Wuensch4448% games+0.4% vs expected
Robin Galloway + Michelle Pulley2347% games−0.4% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Mona Jones5259% games−2.3% vs expected
Christina Cope + Kelly Mcreynolds9358% games−3.0% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Kelly Mcreynolds7362% games−4.2% vs expected
Lydia Wuensch + Kim Kadlic101050% games−4.3% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Michelle Pulley6447% games−5.1% vs expected
Kelly Mcreynolds + Lydia Wuensch8953% games−8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Mcreynolds
127W–50L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Christina Cope
29W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Kadlic
111W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Mona Jones
67W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Paula Nelsen
85W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Robin Galloway
32W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Lydia Wuensch
65W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Melissa Bonnette
40W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Michelle Pulley
38W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Judith Laursen
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paulette Medley
58W–15L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.