← Teams

PTC-Lanigan/Farris

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Maureen Dugan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Sue Gregoire
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.03
Sierra Wright
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.99
Timora Konigwilcox
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.97
Michelle Mehr
published 4.5
3.97
Whitney Ludtke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Corinne Celko
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Xia Wu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.88
Elise Anderson
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4.5
3.85
Deanna Lautenbach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.80
Tiare Farris
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.76
Jill Sather
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Kira Dennison Capen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Results6 ties
2020-03-07Lost 1–4
W#1 DoublesJill Sather / Timora Konigwilcox vs Leslie Ballard / Alison Marsh Harrison2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTiare Farris vs Tamara Justus6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSue Gregoire / Maureen Dugan vs Amiee Moyers / Juan Li6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesElise Anderson vs Honghui Liang6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCarrie Engle / Sierra Wright vs Maureen Harwood / Emiko Kogure7-5, 6-4
2020-02-29Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesTiare Farris / Sarah Lanigan vs Amanda Solomon / Karen Sullivan7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKira Dennison Capen vs Mary Bullard6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesCorinne Celko vs Linda Fosberg6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesXia Wu / Sue Gregoire vs Lisa Gray / Karen Mathews1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-02-16Lost 2–3
L#1 DoublesKira Dennison Capen / Jackie Dooris vs Michelle Donato / Chiho Cronk7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTiare Farris vs Kimberly Quach6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSue Gregoire / Deanna Lautenbach vs Cathrine Olander / Kristen Stedman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesElise Anderson vs Rebecca Redding6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWhitney Ludtke / Jill Sather vs Yuko Hopman / Teresa Neal6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2020-01-19Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesXia Wu / Whitney Ludtke vs Raini Spitze / Allison Schenk7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTiare Farris vs Suzanne DeLea3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTimora Konigwilcox vs Jamie Slonaker7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTonya Dirk / Deanna Lautenbach vs Launi Smith / Cathy Valentine6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2019-12-15Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesChris Collins / Tiare Farris vs Bradley Sumoge / Nicole Partch4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-12-14Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesChris Collins / Tiare Farris vs Sarah Lanigan / Meshi Chavez7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Maureen Dugan
26W–22L career
3%97%0%
4.13
4.5
Sue Gregoire
120W–80L career
3%97%0%
4.11
4.5
Sierra Wright
80W–69L career
11%89%0%
4.03
4.5
Timora Konigwilcox
35W–68L career
19%81%0%
3.99
4.5
Michelle Mehr
22W–46L career
24%76%0%
3.97
4.5
Whitney Ludtke
18W–28L career
27%73%0%
3.97
4.5
Corinne Celko
27W–33L career
25%75%0%
3.96
4.5
Xia Wu
54W–79L career · type A
33%67%0%
3.92
4.5
Elise Anderson
84W–81L career · type A
47%53%0%
3.88
4.5
Deanna Lautenbach
55W–83L career
55%45%0%
3.85
4.5
Tiare Farris
43W–54L career
65%35%0%
3.80
4
Jill Sather
45W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Kira Dennison Capen
28W–40L career · type A
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.