Teams

Garner NC 3.0W

2025 Team Singles Tournament-NE · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-02vs Cotton DEL 3.0WLost 12
L#1 SinglesJessica Flesch vs Michie Cotton2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHoustyn Loosier vs Brianne DeLoach5-7, 6-7
W#3 SinglesBailey Rodgers vs Ann Morgan6-1, 6-2
2025-03-01vs Gammill NE 3.0WWon 20
W#1 SinglesHoustyn Loosier vs Sara Gammill6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesBailey Rodgers vs Rebekah Wiseman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Black NC 3.0WLost 02
L#1 SinglesLibby Nabors vs Heather McDonald0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesHoustyn Loosier vs Margaret Baker4-6, 5-7
2025-02-28vs Beck NE 3.0WWon 20
W#1 SinglesJessica Flesch vs Alli Maloney6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLibby Nabors vs Ashley Gilliland7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Jessica Flesch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Bailey Rodgers
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.88
Libby Nabors
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.74
Lindsey Garner
published
2.67
Houstyn Loosier
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.56
Pam Johnson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Flesch
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Bailey Rodgers
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Libby Nabors
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
Lindsey Garner
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.74
Houstyn Loosier
33W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
Pam Johnson
34W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.