Teams

Gammill NE 3.0W

2025 Team Singles Tournament-NE · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-02vs Upton EC 3.0WLost 12
W#1 SinglesKelly Young vs Hillary Richardson6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesElise Mcmasters vs Leah Howard5-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesLacey Harden vs Patti Stanley6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-03-01vs Garner NC 3.0WLost 12
L#1 SinglesSara Gammill vs Houstyn Loosier0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHester Lowe vs Emily Green7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRebekah Wiseman vs Bailey Rodgers2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-01vs Cotton DEL 3.0WWon 21
W#1 SinglesKelly Young vs Brianne DeLoach6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesElise Mcmasters vs Michie Cotton0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSara Gammill vs Brooke Tims7-6, 6-0
2025-02-28vs Black NC 3.0WWon 21
W#1 SinglesKelly Young vs MiHyang Faulks6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesHester Lowe vs Margaret Baker6-4, 7-5
L#3 SinglesTabi Talley vs Mary Kate Whelan4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Kelly Young
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.84
Elise Mcmasters
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.80
Rebekah Wiseman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Lacey Harden
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.72
Sara Gammill
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.68
Hester Lowe
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.24
Tabi Talley
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hester Lowe + Elise Mcmasters4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Young
37W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Elise Mcmasters
36W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.84
Rebekah Wiseman
27W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
Lacey Harden
24W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Sara Gammill
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%6%94%
2.72
Hester Lowe
35W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.68
Tabi Talley
6W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.