Teams

Cramer/Dawson/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-12vs Mouser/Givens/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesLynn Blocher / Claudia Paz vs Kelly Clapp / Catherine Pietsch7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNina Kumar vs Ellen Gooden6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Megan McDugald vs Patricia Frawley / Brandy Kennedy1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLauren Wideman vs Stephanie Hill5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKate Thompson / Chiarra Jessey vs Anne Jetton / Janelle VanHootegem6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-11-11vs Stephens/NashvilleWon 32
L#1 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Megan McDugald vs Heidi Tieslau / Jill Labetti4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLynn Blocher vs Nicole Carter6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEileen Brantley / Kate Thompson vs Laurel Dortch / Elizabeth Stanley3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLauren Wideman vs Cara Adams6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChiarra Jessey / Susan Gillis vs Maret Caamano / Rebekah Carroll7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-05vs Stamelos/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Megan McDugald vs Christina Beattie / Jennifer Frank6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLynn Blocher vs Katie Black1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChiarra Jessey / Eileen Brantley vs Mary Stamelos / Jennifer Lucas4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNina Kumar vs Courtney Fraser-Mason6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Madison Fair vs Mariel Newkirk / Elyse Hood6-1, 6-2
2025-10-22vs Barnes/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Traci Gilbert-Stafford vs Orly Cohen / Christine Maroon6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBrooke Scanlon vs Jane Decker4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKelly Dawson / Elisa Hill vs Elizabeth Brown / Katherine Kirkland6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKate Thompson / Cynthia Madson vs Penelope Sevier / Ellen Weinman6-1, 6-1
2025-10-15vs Lindsay/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesClaudia Paz / Lynn Blocher vs Laquisia Brown / Laura Beckert6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesNina Kumar vs Caroline Tapscott6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElisa Hill / Cynthia Madson vs Tiffini Lindsay / Suzanne Spalding2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Madison Fair vs Meredith Thomas / Michele Carter6-3, 6-3
2025-10-08vs Mouser/Givens/NashvilleWon 32
L#1 DoublesChiarra Jessey / Susan Gillis vs Kelly Clapp / Catherine Pietsch0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLauren Wideman vs Stephanie Hill6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Blocher / Claudia Paz vs Ashley West / LISA MEISTER6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNina Kumar vs Ellen Gooden6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMadison Fair / Kelly Dawson vs Stephanie Protz / Melissa Goldberg7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-01vs Stamelos/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesLynn Blocher / Claudia Paz vs Christina Beattie / Dawn Cole4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNina Kumar vs Myrvete Korenberg6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Traci Gilbert-Stafford vs Jacque Ramsey / Renee Anzivino3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBrooke Scanlon vs Jennifer Lucas4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Dawson / Madison Fair vs Mary Stamelos / Mariel Newkirk6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings33 teams · 3.5 Women - FRI AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Babu/Hambridge/Nashville7028720251
2Powers/Collins/Nashville70241125261
3Shalk/Villalta/Nashville6129620236
4Cramer/Dawson/Nashville61201537314
5George/Bernstein/Nashville5124614162
6Burnstein/Nashville51201024217
7Simpson/McNabb/Nashville51191125234
8Neeley/Brandon/Nashville51171329230
9Lindsay/Nashville52231227251
10Mouser/Givens/Nashville52231229274
11Buhalis/Nashville52171842311
12Keally/Lee/Nashville4221921239
13Shaffer/Vandever/Nashville4222823243
14Dye/Goodrich/Nashville43221329252
15Palk/Nashville43191638316
16Rucks/Nashville33151532263
17Luckinbill/Nashville34191636305
18Fisher/Burton/Nashville34191637319
19Stephens/Nashville34171839305
20Ossman/Kahl/Nashville34152043305
21Sather/Nashville34161943317
22Kaye/Nashville34161943328
23Kingman/Hocker/Nashville24111938266
24Stamelos/Nashville25171837280
25Patrizio/Nashville25142147341
26Steed/Rice/Nashville15131737266
27Patterson/Nashville1582246302
28Monte/Spittle/Nashville1562450326
29Phillips/Nashville16112454373
30Eftekhari/Nashville1692657385
31Parrish/Nashville0632756349
32Barnes/Nashville0753060387
33Thoma/Nashville0743164400

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Lauren Wideman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.34
Nina Kumar
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.33
Megan McDugald
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Claudia Paz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.21
Lynn Blocher
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.17
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Chiarra Jessey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Kaelin Cramer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Elisa Hill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Brooke Scanlon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.86
Madison Fair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Cynthia Madson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Eileen Brantley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Paz + Lynn Blocher8453% games+5.3% vs expected
Lauren Wideman + Nina Kumar11653% games+4.8% vs expected
Kaelin Cramer + Traci Gilbert-Stafford6749% games+0.0% vs expected
Megan McDugald + Kaelin Cramer6551% games−0.1% vs expected
Cynthia Madson + Elisa Hill3350% gamesnot enough data
Megan McDugald + Traci Gilbert-Stafford1445% gamesnot enough data
Nina Kumar + Elisa Hill2357% gamesnot enough data
Madison Fair + Elisa Hill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Wideman
27W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Nina Kumar
36W–40L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Megan McDugald
18W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Claudia Paz
25W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Lynn Blocher
32W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
32W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3.5
Chiarra Jessey
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
Kaelin Cramer
30W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Elisa Hill
25W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Brooke Scanlon
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Madison Fair
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Cynthia Madson
23W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Eileen Brantley
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.