Teams

GF:Super Smash Brothers:Kaplan

2022 ECT Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.0 Men Flt 1

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-18vs LS:Rowdy Racketeers:Anastas/FayeWon 21
L#1 DoublesJohn la Pan / Peter Nichols vs Jeff Scheckwitz / Bert MacEsker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKen Waterman vs Steven Johnson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonald Bernier / Martin Tillier vs Claude Flory / Tom Lee6-1, 6-2
2022-06-04vs LS:Rowdy Racketeers:Anastas/FayeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn la Pan / Peter Nichols vs Thomas Baldwin / Thomas Kraft6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnthony Ferrara / Stephen Thomas vs Rico Mastronunzio / Jeff Scheckwitz1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Mainor / Mark Warner vs Claude Flory / M Strafaci1-6, 6-7
2022-05-21vs LS:Rowdy Racketeers:Anastas/FayeLost 13
L#1 DoublesDonald Bernier / Oliver Yuan vs Steven Johnson / Rich Clippinger7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStephen Thomas vs Bert MacEsker0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJohn la Pan / Peter Nichols vs M Strafaci / Rico Mastronunzio6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesClaude Wasterlain / William Mainor vs Tom Lee / James Craffey5-7, 2-6
2022-04-30vs LS:Rowdy Racketeers:Anastas/FayeLost 13
W#1 DoublesPeter Nichols / Ken Waterman vs Rich Clippinger / Tim Curtin4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJon Leiberman vs Bert MacEsker3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesOliver Yuan / Andrew Kaplan vs Thomas Baldwin / Thomas Kraft2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMartin Tillier / Anthony Ferrara vs James Craffey / Clive Thomas2-6, 4-6
2022-04-09vs LS:Rowdy Racketeers:Anastas/FayeWon 31
L#1 DoublesJon Leiberman / Stephen Thomas vs Thomas Baldwin / Bert MacEsker0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKen Waterman vs Thomas Kraft6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDonald Bernier / Andrew Kaplan vs Steven Johnson / Clive Thomas6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Aron / John la Pan vs Tom Lee / Claude Flory6-2, 6-1
2022-03-19vs LS:Rowdy Racketeers:Anastas/FayeLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Kaplan / Peter Nichols vs Rich Clippinger / Tim Curtin3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDonald Bernier / Ken Waterman vs Steven Johnson / William Faye6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWilliam Mainor / Stephen Thomas vs James Craffey / M Strafaci2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS:Rowdy Racketeers:Anastas/Faye06141022193
2GF:Super Smash Brothers:Kaplan06101430218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
John la Pan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Andrew Kaplan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Anthony Ferrara
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Mark Aron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Claude Wasterlain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Donald Bernier
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
John Dobbins
published
Jon Leiberman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ken Waterman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mark Warner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Martin Tillier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Oliver Yuan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Stephen Thomas
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
William Mainor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Kaplan + Martin Tillier11139% games+0.2% vs expected
Oliver Yuan + Donald Bernier5452% games−5.7% vs expected
Anthony Ferrara + Mark Aron1538% gamesnot enough data
Mark Aron + Donald Bernier3354% gamesnot enough data
Oliver Yuan + Ken Waterman4159% gamesnot enough data
Anthony Ferrara + Martin Tillier134 matchesnot enough data
Martin Tillier + Mark Aron224 matchesnot enough data
William Mainor + Martin Tillier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John la Pan
24W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Andrew Kaplan
11W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Anthony Ferrara
22W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
Mark Aron
33W–62L career · 1 line in 2022
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Claude Wasterlain
2W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
Donald Bernier
19W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Dobbins
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jon Leiberman
6W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ken Waterman
21W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Warner
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Martin Tillier
15W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Oliver Yuan
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Nichols
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Thomas
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Mainor
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.