Teams

LS:Rowdy Racketeers:Anastas/Faye

2022 ECT Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.0 Men Flt 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-18vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Scheckwitz / Bert MacEsker vs John la Pan / Peter Nichols4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSteven Johnson vs Ken Waterman1-6, 1-6
2022-06-04vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanWon 21
L#1 DoublesThomas Baldwin / Thomas Kraft vs John la Pan / Peter Nichols3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRico Mastronunzio / Jeff Scheckwitz vs Anthony Ferrara / Stephen Thomas6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClaude Flory / M Strafaci vs William Mainor / Mark Warner6-1, 7-6
2022-05-21vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanWon 31
W#1 DoublesSteven Johnson / Rich Clippinger vs Donald Bernier / Oliver Yuan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBert MacEsker vs Stephen Thomas6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesM Strafaci / Rico Mastronunzio vs John la Pan / Peter Nichols3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTom Lee / James Craffey vs Claude Wasterlain / William Mainor7-5, 6-2
2022-04-30vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanWon 31
L#1 DoublesRich Clippinger / Tim Curtin vs Peter Nichols / Ken Waterman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBert MacEsker vs Jon Leiberman6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesThomas Baldwin / Thomas Kraft vs Oliver Yuan / Andrew Kaplan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Craffey / Clive Thomas vs Martin Tillier / Anthony Ferrara6-2, 6-4
2022-04-09vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanLost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Baldwin / Bert MacEsker vs Jon Leiberman / Stephen Thomas6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesThomas Kraft vs Ken Waterman1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Johnson / Clive Thomas vs Donald Bernier / Andrew Kaplan3-6, 4-6
2022-03-19vs GF:Super Smash Brothers:KaplanWon 21
W#1 DoublesRich Clippinger / Tim Curtin vs Andrew Kaplan / Peter Nichols6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSteven Johnson / William Faye vs Donald Bernier / Ken Waterman0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJames Craffey / M Strafaci vs William Mainor / Stephen Thomas6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS:Rowdy Racketeers:Anastas/Faye06141022193
2GF:Super Smash Brothers:Kaplan06101430218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Tim Curtin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Rich Clippinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Jeff Scheckwitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Bert MacEsker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Peter Anastas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Clive Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
James Craffey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
William Faye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Claude Flory
published
M Strafaci
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rico Mastronunzio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Baldwin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Kraft
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Anastas + Jeff Scheckwitz4360% games+8.0% vs expected
Rich Clippinger + Jeff Scheckwitz3259% games+3.1% vs expected
Rich Clippinger + M Strafaci4654% gamesnot enough data
M Strafaci + James Craffey5457% gamesnot enough data
James Craffey + William Faye4351% gamesnot enough data
Peter Anastas + M Strafaci2338% gamesnot enough data
James Craffey + Jeff Scheckwitz3255% gamesnot enough data
Rich Clippinger + Peter Anastas044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Curtin
45W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
Rich Clippinger
68W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
Jeff Scheckwitz
57W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Bert MacEsker
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Anastas
56W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Clive Thomas
40W–141L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
3
James Craffey
66W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
William Faye
27W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
32%67%<1%
2.56
Claude Flory
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
M Strafaci
42W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rico Mastronunzio
35W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Johnson
19W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Baldwin
7W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Kraft
8W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.