Teams

Mission Oaks Wrecking Balls

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WD

19 players · average NTRP 3.72 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Kristine Werner
published
3.73
Helina Wu
published
3.63
Adora Chu
published 4
3.63
Akemi Martin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Hilary Muxlow
published
3.61
Dai Cabaret
published 4
3.59
Lauren Koenig
published
3.56
Roberta Reis
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.53
Mignonne Nieva
published
3.44
Denise Bolish
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Annie Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.43
Kristin Casanova
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.42
May Leslie
published
3.39
Linda Meier
published
3.39
Michele Ploudre
published
3.36
Lisa Moran
published
3.32
Annie Kakuk
published 3.5
3.30
Joan OByrne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Elizabeth Jensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Bolish + Kristin Casanova753257% games+3.7% vs expected
Linda Meier + May Leslie1440% games−4.2% vs expected
Annie Kakuk + Elizabeth Jensen4542% games−4.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Jensen + Roberta Reis5642% games−7.6% vs expected
Annie Schwartz + Akemi Martin2546% gamesnot enough data
Helina Wu + Akemi Martin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Werner
21W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Helina Wu
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Adora Chu
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Akemi Martin
73W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Hilary Muxlow
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Dai Cabaret
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lauren Koenig
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Roberta Reis
72W–51L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Mignonne Nieva
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Denise Bolish
123W–60L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
4
Annie Schwartz
144W–179L career · 5 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Kristin Casanova
100W–47L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
May Leslie
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Linda Meier
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Michele Ploudre
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Lisa Moran
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Annie Kakuk
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Joan OByrne
50W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Elizabeth Jensen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.