Teams

ALPINE HILLS CW5.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 5.5

32 players · average NTRP 2.85 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-21vs MITCHELL PK CW5.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesHayley Bakken / Lauren Bochnowski vs Suyeon Kwon / Sunny Kim6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeila Mehra / Julie Harding vs Hyo Jung Han / Hyunah Cho6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSamantha Bufton / Kristin Brew vs Hien Nguyen / Renata Cunha1-6, 4-6
2025-10-15vs CUESTA TC CW5.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Ward / Maria Matsumoto vs Isabel Stroecker / Laura Ip6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSamantha Bufton / Patricia Law vs Paola Mazzocchi / Dimitra Papachristou2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlisha Senescu / Caitlin Rozzi vs Christine Niebuhr / Linda Daniel7-5, 6-2
2025-09-17vs MITCHELL PK CW5.5A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Gillis / Lucia Rotelli vs Jessica Yu / Yun Zhang7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHayley Bakken / Wendi Karam vs Youjin Kim / Hyunah Cho0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Sagan / Chelsea Matter vs Hyo Jung Han / Hien Nguyen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-09vs CUESTA TC CW5.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaneen Poutre / Liana Brown vs Laura Berchtold / Elena Mitschkowetz7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSylvia Thompson / Kristin Brew vs Isabel Stroecker / Dimitra Papachristou2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRenata Dionello / Patricia Law vs Christine Niebuhr / Demetra Metaxas6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 28 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Tanya Gacs
published
3.23
Lauren Sagan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Hayley Bakken
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.10
Leila Mehra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Janeen Poutre
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Catherine Gillis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Lauren Bochnowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Aimee Armsby
published 3
2.88
Amy An
published 3
2.84
Dale Lachtman
published 3
2.77
Emily Lopez
published 3
2.77
Maria Matsumoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Sylvia Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Alisha Senescu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Elise Gabrielson
published 3
2.68
Renata Dionello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Jami Worthington
published 3
2.62
Samantha Bufton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Melissa Land
published
2.52
Patricia Bors
published
2.51
Julie Harding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Kristin Brew
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.43
Alana Achterkirchen
published 2.5
2.40
Patricia Law
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Caitlin Rozzi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Chelsea Matter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Wendi Karam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Marjel Scheuer
published
2.20
Denby Sellers
published 2.5
2.18
Sallie DeGolia
published
Liana Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lucia Rotelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Armsby + Samantha Bufton3257% gamesnot enough data
Emily Lopez + Dale Lachtman314 matchesnot enough data
Denby Sellers + Maria Matsumoto404 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Gillis + Hayley Bakken213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Harding + Maria Matsumoto213 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Bors + Maria Matsumoto303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tanya Gacs
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Lauren Sagan
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Hayley Bakken
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
Leila Mehra
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
Janeen Poutre
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.01
3
Catherine Gillis
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Lauren Bochnowski
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.92
3
Aimee Armsby
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Amy An
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Dale Lachtman
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Emily Lopez
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Maria Matsumoto
18W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%2%98%
2.77
Sylvia Thompson
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%4%96%
2.73
3
Alisha Senescu
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Elise Gabrielson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
Renata Dionello
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%8%92%
2.68
3
Jami Worthington
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Samantha Bufton
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
Melissa Land
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61
Patricia Bors
11W–0L career · no lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Julie Harding
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%46%54%
2.51
Kristin Brew
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Alana Achterkirchen
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.43
Patricia Law
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Caitlin Rozzi
1W–0L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Chelsea Matter
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wendi Karam
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Marjel Scheuer
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Denby Sellers
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
Sallie DeGolia
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Liana Brown
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lucia Rotelli
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.