Teams

Moreland

2025 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-05vs ReaLost 01
L#3 SinglesMarie Sokoloff vs Teresa Pedley2-6, 0-6
2025-11-02vs Stellar StrikersLost 01
L#3 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Courtney Laughlin3-6, 6-7
2025-11-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesDeborah Greenside vs Stephanie Riley6-2, 3-0
2025-10-22vs Stellar StrikersWon 10
W#3 SinglesDeborah Greenside vs Lesli Thompson7-5, 6-2
2025-10-16vs ReaLost 03
L#1 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Xenia Baranova1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMarie Sokoloff vs Wenxi Li1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesDeborah Greenside vs Teresa Pedley4-6, 2-6
2025-10-12vs Stellar StrikersSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Krista Swetz6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesLaura Laabs vs Courtney Laughlin6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-30vs ReaLost 02
L#2 SinglesDeborah Greenside vs Ashten Rea1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMarie Sokoloff vs Stephanie Riley1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Stellar StrikersLost 01
L#3 SinglesLaura Laabs vs Lesli Thompson4-6, 3-6
2025-09-21vs ReaLost 01
L#3 SinglesLaura Laabs vs Bari Abensohn3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jill Rose
published
3.70
Jennifer Coady
published
3.63
Savannah Bergen
published
3.55
Deborah Greenside
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
Marie Sokoloff
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Lezlie Moreland
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Laura Laabs
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Laabs + Marie Sokoloff4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Rose
46W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Jennifer Coady
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Savannah Bergen
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Deborah Greenside
139W–167L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Marie Sokoloff
276W–199L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Lezlie Moreland
157W–166L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Laura Laabs
177W–206L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.