Teams

NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Gadacz

NIN SB Combo - Weekend · NIN SB Combo 5.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-02-05vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC BayerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKayzie Weedman / Paige Taelman vs Katie Kitts / Kira Conner0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Gadacz / Maureen Rousseve vs Ann McCarthy / Adrienne Carrier6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesAmanda Gadacz / Maureen Rousseve vs Megan Pocock / Kaley Faust4-6, 0-6
2023-01-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLacie Jones / Kayzie Weedman vs Whitney Hancock / Melissa Christianson5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Epson / Kayzie Weedman vs Julie Dallavis / Heather Christophersen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-12-04vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC BayerWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Taelman / Michele Epson vs Adrienne Carrier / Kaley Anderson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKayzie Weedman / Lacie Jones vs Sheena Zent / Desire' McNary6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAmanda Gadacz / Jenna McIntosh vs Kaley Faust / Rachel Altum1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Epson / Megan Hale vs Alison Brown / Rong Tian4-6, 0-6
2022-11-06vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC HavlishLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmanda Gadacz / Maureen Rousseve vs Danielle Williams / Kristin Swank2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Taelman / Michele Epson vs Blair Endicott / Terez Hein4-6, 2-6
2022-10-30vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC DalllavisLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Gadacz / Michele Epson vs Julie Dallavis / Kyra Clark1-6, 0-6
2022-10-09vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Dew / PflumSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLedi Erichsen / Michele Epson vs Jessica Rush / Kaley Faust0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLacie Jones / Amanda Gadacz vs Quin Dew / Jasmine Shim6-4, 7-5
2022-09-25vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC HavlishSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKayzie Weedman / Lacie Jones vs Amanda Seabaugh / Danielle Williams6-7, 6-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaige Taelman / Michele Epson vs Blair Endicott / Terez Hein4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NIN SB Combo 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Dew / Pflum11129716193
2NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Havlish102251125255
3NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Dalllavis66191735285
4NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Bayer210112551337
5NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Gadacz11163063419

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Michele Epson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.93
Kayzie Weedman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Amanda Gadacz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Epson
64W–30L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
Kayzie Weedman
50W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Amanda Gadacz
18W–26L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.