Teams

NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Dalllavis

NIN SB Combo - Weekend · NIN SB Combo 5.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
L#1 DoublesJulie Dallavis / Katie Harshman vs Jessica Rush / Kaley Faust1-6, 0-4
2023-01-29vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC HavlishWon 10
W#1 DoublesKyra Clark / Lily Shroyer vs Danielle Williams / Angela Snider6-0, 6-2
2023-01-15vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC BayerWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Dallavis / Katie Harshman vs Desire' McNary / Kira Conner6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKyra Clark / Lily Shroyer vs Emily Budzinski / Katie Kitts6-1, 6-2
2022-12-11vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC GadaczSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLily Shroyer / Andrea Swanagan vs Jenna McIntosh / Anneliese Hammer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Dallavis / Heather Christophersen vs Michele Epson / Kayzie Weedman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLily Shroyer / Katie Harshman vs Quin Dew / Alison Brown4-6, 4-6
2022-11-20vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC HavlishLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Dallavis / Marie Loiseau vs Danielle Williams / Trudy Wait1-6, 3-6
2022-11-06vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC BayerWon 10
W#2 DoublesLily Shroyer / Katie Harshman vs Sheena Zent / Katie Kitts6-1, 6-2
2022-10-30vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC GadaczWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Dallavis / Kyra Clark vs Amanda Gadacz / Michele Epson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLily Shroyer / Marie Loiseau vs Paige Taelman / Shelby Mecklem6-3, 6-0
L#1 DoublesJulie Dallavis / Katie Harshman vs Kaley Faust / Laura Pflum3-6, 2-6
2022-10-18vs NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC HavlishWon 10
W#2 DoublesLily Shroyer / Marie Loiseau vs Amanda Seabaugh / Amy Kuzmic3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Dallavis / Katie Harshman vs Megan Hale / Lacie Jones6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NIN SB Combo 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Dew / Pflum11129716193
2NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Havlish102251125255
3NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Dalllavis66191735285
4NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Bayer210112551337
5NIN SB Combo 5.5 W: SBRC Gadacz11163063419

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Julie Dallavis
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Connie Varga
published 3
Lily Shroyer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Dallavis
73W–70L career · 14 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Connie Varga
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lily Shroyer
40W–17L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.